Teen apparel retailer American Eagle reels as CEO Hanson abruptly departs
By Alex Nixon
Published: Sunday, Jan. 26, 2014, 7:31 p.m.
Robert Hanson's abrupt departure from the top job at teen apparel retailer American Eagle Outfitters caught many off-guard.
“Premature,” “unexpected” and “surprising” was the Wall Street buzz last week as retail analysts digested the news.
“Hanson and his team had had a lot of success,” said Burt Flickinger III, managing director of Strategic Resource Group in New York, who counted himself among the surprised analysts.
Hanson, CEO for only two years, had been praised for closing under-performing stores, selling a children's clothing line, improving online sales and increasing logistics efficiency.
But sales fizzled during 2013, culminating in a disappointing Christmas shopping season. Profits fell, and the stock tanked.
Whether Hanson left on his own or was forced out remains unclear. The Pittsburgh-based company would say only that Hanson left and Jay Schottenstein — former CEO, its longtime chairman and one of its largest shareholders — took over as interim CEO.
Schottenstein declined an interview request, and Hanson couldn't be reached. A search is on for a permanent CEO, the company said.
Hanson faced a difficult set of circumstances at American Eagle, experts said, some of which fell outside his control.
Overall economic trends are squeezing shoppers' budgets across the retail industry, and most clothing stores, including American Eagle's direct competitors, have experienced declining sales.
“When Hanson and his team took over, everyone thought the economy was turning for American Eagle's core demographic,” Flickinger said, referring to consumers ages 15 to 29. “You look at teen or student retailing, it's just a wasteland.”
American Eagle's revenue for the nine weeks ended Jan. 4 dropped 2 percent to $882 million, compared with $904 million for the nine weeks ended Dec. 29, 2012, the company said this month. Results comparing stores open for at least a year were even worse, dropping 7 percent.
The company will report fourth-quarter and full 2013 results in March, but over the first three quarters, net income plummeted 47 percent. Its stock value crumbled 28 percent during last year.
On Thursday, the day after Hanson's departure was announced, investors took the news badly. American Eagle shares fell $1.12, or 8 percent, to $13.19. On Friday, the stock dropped another 37 cents to $12.82.
But it wasn't all external pressures that weighed on Hanson's performance. American Eagle was slow to respond to changing tastes of its customers, said Craig Johnson, president of Customer Growth Partners in Connecticut.
The all-important female shopper, if she's buying apparel, will go to so-called “fast-fashion” stores H&M, Forever 21 and Zara, which tend to be less pricey, Johnson said.
Paige Pegher, 16, of Greenfield said she likes American Eagle's clothing but finds it too expensive.
“I prefer Forever 21 and H&M because they are more affordable,”Pegher said. “I have some items from American Eagle, but they should just offer better prices for their clothes.”
American Eagle's basic proposition to core customers “has not materially changed in the last decade,” Johnson said.
Generally, he said, the reaction of female shoppers walking into American Eagle stores was: “Hey, that's where my older sister used to shop and it's like yesterday's news.”
A pair of Pittsburgh shoppers confirmed the analyst's sentiments.
“I like American Eagle,” said Aditi Shah, a University of Pittsburgh sophomore waiting recently for a bus near the American Eagle store at SouthSide Works. She and her friend, fellow Pitt sophomore Kaitlin Augustine, carried bags from H&M, Forever 21 and Urban Outfitters.
“But sometimes their clothing and styles aren't as trendy,” Shah said. “They are repetitive. A lot of their sweaters are the same style every time.”
Hanson acknowledged during conference calls with analysts over the past year that the company failed to “execute” when it came to getting the most appealing fashion into its stores.
There were seasonal misses. In May, for example, Hanson told analysts that the company stocked stores with warm weather clothing too early during a colder-than-normal spring.
Another factor beyond his control was Schottenstein's presence, some analysts suggested.
Schottenstein was CEO from 1992 to 2002 and chairman from 1992 to 2012. He became executive chairman in 2012, when Hanson started.
“Anytime you have a chairman or founder that is still hanging around ... it's a recipe for disaster,” Johnson said.
Many companies have experienced the difficulty caused when a former CEO maintains an active role, he said. The CEO asks, “Who's really in charge here?” Johnson said, and junior executives can wonder the same thing.
Investment firms suggested friction developed between Schottenstein and Hanson.
Piper Jaffray & Co. noted there was “little evidence to suggest abrupt change was solely business-driven,” according to a research note from the New York firm.
“Seems to us this was a board decision,” according to Wells Fargo Securities, which said American Eagle's board may have difficulty in finding a replacement because it “seems Hanson was on a pretty short leash.”
Alex Nixon is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7928 or email@example.com. Staff writer Joanne Klimovich Harrop and Bloomberg News contributed to this report.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Wages have soared in Pittsburgh, but economy appears to have stalled
- Emboldened by Italy move, QVC to expand into France
- Facebook feature lets users locate nearby pals
- Secret Service close to understanding Target data breach
- PPG shareholders vote against proposals; sales, profit see double-digit increases
- Former BP employee settles insider-trading charges
- Target expands subscription service tenfold
- Applications for jobless aid edge up
- Wal-Mart rolls out money transfer service
- Judge won’t order recalled GM cars to be parked
- Robinson bakehouse invests time, love in artisan products