ShareThis Page

Marcellus shale responsible for $1.14B in deals

| Wednesday, Jan. 29, 2014, 12:01 a.m.

A slate of big-dollar deals returned to the Marcellus shale late last year, with more than $1 billion spent on mergers and acquisitions in three months for the first time since the spring of 2012.

Companies are looking to capitalize on the steady improvement in the region's natural gas production and growth in customers. Drillers are benefiting from bountiful wells that are producing more gas than expected and at lower costs as well as a buildup in pipelines for delivery, said Doug Meier, U.S. energy sector deals leader at Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP.

“If you put those two things together, you've got a pretty substantial improvement in cash flow coming out of those wells,” said Meier, whose accounting firm released its quarterly analysis of oil and gas deals on Tuesday.

There were four deals for Marcellus land from October through December. They totaled $1.14 billion, about the same as the prior nine months combined. Property in the gas-rich Utica shale accounted for about $284 million in two deals.

Local deal-making benefited from a national trend, said PricewaterhouseCoopers. More oil and gas companies were selling off ancillary property to raise cash and boost their balance sheets and share prices.

The two biggest Marcellus shale deals both fit that category, according to IHS Inc., an energy research and consulting firm that tracks these deals. Chesapeake Energy Corp. sold wells and leases from eastern Pennsylvania to a partnership led by Chief Oil & Gas LLC for $500 million. Rice Energy Inc. gave a package worth $300 million to buy out joint-venture partner Alpha Natural Resources Inc. as Rice went public.

Deal-makers in oil and gas had focused on oil-rich areas in recent years, but parts of the Marcellus have liquid gases like propane and ethane, and easier access to populated eastern markets that have helped it compete for investors' attention. In addition to all the pipelines, growing momentum for natural gas exports has pushed up interest, too, said Christopher Sheehan, director of mergers and acquisition research at IHS Herold in Connecticut.

“It's one of the few gas basins in the U.S. right now where we did see a pickup in upstream deal activity,” he said. “There were pretty strong well economics in the (area) where the deals were.”

Timothy Puko is a Trib Total Media staff writer. He can be reached at 412-320-7991 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.