Renewal of contract with Highmark would cost UPMC $500M
By Alex Nixon
Published: Thursday, Feb. 6, 2014, 12:01 a.m.
UPMC disclosed for the first time on Wednesday the financial pain it would feel if it renewed a contract with Highmark: $500 million annually in lost revenue.
The hospital giant has maintained that Highmark, the state's biggest health insurer, would siphon tens of thousands of patients a year from UPMC for Allegheny Health Network, which the insurer spent more than $2 billion to establish as a competitor to UPMC.
“That would decimate UPMC as you know it today,” Chief Financial Officer Robert DeMichiei said during an interview with reporters to discuss UPMC's financial results in the October-December quarter. The lost revenue would amount to about 5 percent of the system's yearly total.
A renewed contract would allow Highmark to advertise its health plans as offering less-costly in-network access to UPMC, Western Pennsylvania's largest hospital network, but in reality, the insurer would steer members away from UPMC by charging them lower co-pays to use Highmark-owned hospitals, DeMichiei argued.
“I find it hard to understand the business sense of what they're arguing,” Highmark spokesman Aaron Billger said.
UPMC stands to lose $2 billion a year in claims paid by Highmark by not renewing a contract and losing Highmark members, he added.
Billger also said a renewed contract would allow patients to “pick the hospital that they find the most value in.”
Highmark's turnaround plans, filed with state regulators last year as part of the approval process to buy and rejuvenate West Penn Allegheny Health System, call for the insurer to move 41,000 patients a year from UPMC and some community hospitals to Allegheny Health Network.
DeMichiei said he has estimated the loss of that number of patients a year would equate to $500 million annually.
UPMC's strategy has been to let its reimbursement contract expire and persuade Highmark customers to switch insurers. After the contract expires at the end of this year, UPMC Health Plan, Aetna Inc., United Healthcare and Cigna Corp. will offer full in-network access to UPMC.
Highmark members will continue to have in-network access to several of UPMC's specialty and rural hospitals, such as Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, UPMC Bedford and UPMC Northwest.
UPMC Health Plan's membership has grown in the last year, DeMichiei said on Wednesday. Total membership as of January was 2.29 million, up 10 percent from a year earlier. Membership from employer groups was 486,473 in January, up 9 percent from the same point last year.
That increase in insurance customers, along with higher patient volume in its hospital business and profits from its commercial services division, boosted UPMC's pre-tax operating income to $57.5 million in the October-December quarter. In the same period last year, UPMC reported $12.5 million in pre-tax operating income.
After taxes and costs related to the acquisition of UPMC Altoona, operating income was $43 million, up from $15.9 million a year earlier.
Revenue was $2.9 billion, up from $2.5 billion.
Net income, which includes non-operating gains from investments, was $156.8 million in the quarter, which is the second quarter in UPMC's July-June fiscal year. Net income in the same period a year earlier was $66.4 million.
Alex Nixon is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7928 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Bitcoin’s father said to be found
- Google barge departs San Francisco to new home
- Vital signs reveal job market’s reality
- ADT settles deception charges
- Disney to lay off 700 from interactive unit
- Silicon ‘Valley of haves, have-nots’
- Natural gas industry buoyed by advancing technology
- Startup envisions ring that could rule them all
- Obamacare enrollment has ‘lot of ground to cover’
- Unemployment data lift spirits on Wall Street
- Stock, housing gains boost net worth