Verizon Wireless to close Marshall, Cranberry call centers, cut 1,000 jobs
Verizon Wireless will slice more than 1,000 jobs in Western Pennsylvania when it closes customer call centers in Cranberry and Marshall in May, the company said on Wednesday.
“This was a very difficult but necessary business decision,” Verizon Wireless spokeswoman Laura Merritt said in a statement.
The Cranberry call center employs about 600 customer service workers in the Cranberry Woods business park. The one in neighboring Marshall will lose about 430 workers, including 200 in telemarketing and 230 in business and government support.
A Verizon regional headquarters for Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia will remain in Marshall, preserving 340 jobs.
“We are always sorry to see a business close in Cranberry Township and the impact that has on the employees,” said Cranberry manager Jerry Andree.
Several Verizon employees declined to comment on the company's decision outside the local call centers.
Verizon is making the changes amid signs that competition is heating up in the wireless market. Rivals AT&T Inc., Sprint Corp. and T-Mobile US Inc. all have been rolling out less expensive subscription plans in an attempt to lure away one another's customers.
“We also understand this is part of business ebb and flow, in that companies come and go on a constant basis,” Andree said. “Verizon Wireless will be vacating an attractive building in a very desirable location, and we are confident another company will locate there.”
He pointed to PPG Industries Inc.'s decision in the fall to add 500 jobs in Cranberry Woods, softening the blow of Westinghouse Electric Co.'s eliminating 200 in the business park months earlier.
About 8,000 people work in Cranberry Woods, where Verizon Wireless was one of the original tenants about a dozen years ago, Andree said.
Andree, reached by the Tribune-Review shortly after learning of the job cuts from news reports, said it was too soon to tell how the moves would affect township finances, noting many of Verizon's employees come from elsewhere and don't pay local earned income or property taxes. The company leases office space.
Verizon rival AT&T slashed about 200 jobs at two Pittsburgh call centers last year.
Verizon Wireless, the biggest U.S. mobile phone carrier, plans to close three other customer service call centers in California and Connecticut in a cost-cutting move that will affect 5,200 workers total. Verizon said 2,200 employees will transfer to other offices within driving distance, and the remaining 3,000 can apply for other positions locally, relocate with company assistance to similar positions at 26 remaining call centers or accept a buyout package.
About 600 Cranberry-based employees will be able to relocate to any of the 26 centers, and 40 employees will be able to relocate to the Marshall facility. Marshall's telemarketing employees can go to other telemarketing centers in Tampa; Rancho Cordova, Calif.; or Orangeburg, N.Y.
Its business and government support workers could seek similar jobs in Hilliard, Ohio; Hanover, Md.; or Alpharetta, Ga.
Verizon Wireless, which has about 73,000 employees, is offering relocation assistance of $10,000. Employees looking to visit another potential call center location to see if they want to move there can get $500 from the company to offset travel costs.
Merritt said the moves will “fill vacant space and make better use of the company's facilities.”
Verizon Communications, which owns 55 percent of Verizon Wireless, posted a net profit of $7.9 billion in last year's fourth quarter, up from a $1.93 billion loss during the same period a year earlier. Its earnings slightly exceeded analysts' expectations.
Tom Fontaine is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7847 or firstname.lastname@example.org. Staff writer Rachel Farkas and The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Muni bond funds stressed
- PPG puts brand 1st in strategy to reach commercial paint market
- EPA ordered to ease limits on cross-border air pollution that involves Pennsylvania
- Energy spotlight: Larry Schweiger
- Travelers find Internet direct route to Priory’s spirited past in Pittsburgh’s North Side
- Plummeting natural gas prices slash revenue of Marcellus shale producers
- Steelworkers union says U.S. Steel using downturn to ‘gut’ contract
- Alcoa among 13 firms in $140B carbon-footprint pledge
- Pa. improves performance among competitive electric markets
- U.S. Steel joins major producers in new dumping complaint
- U.S. Steel posts quarterly loss, declares dividend