TribLIVE

| Business


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

UAW lodges appeal over loss in Tenn. vote

By The Los Angeles Times
Saturday, Feb. 22, 2014, 12:01 a.m.
 

The United Auto Workers union appealed to the National Labor Relations Board on Friday, contesting the failed unionization vote at Volkswagen's Chattanooga plant, saying several conservative politicians mounted a coercive campaign to dissuade workers from approving the union.

In the days leading up to last week's election, several lawmakers from Tennessee suggested that subsidies for Volkswagen might evaporate if the plant was unionized. They also said production of a new vehicle could be pushed to Mexico instead of Tennessee.

“The state officials' threats were a constant presence in the minds of voters in the period immediately before and during the election, and were a blatant attempt to create an atmosphere of fear of harm to employees, their jobs and the viability of their employer and cause employees to vote against UAW representation out of fear,” UAW said in an appeal filed with the NLRB.

The union called for a new election free from interference by politicians and special-interest groups.

The attorney working with an anti-union campaign at the plant told the Los Angeles Times that he expects the appeal to be denied.

“When you look at the law on third-party interference, the law sets a very high bar,” Maury Nicely said. “This doesn't meet the standard.”

The narrow defeat in Chattanooga was an embarrassing setback for the UAW, which had hoped to establish a union at a Southern foreign-owned factory for the first time and deliver confidence to its Motor City members. It remains the only major Volkswagen factory in the world without a union, and the company's union in Germany has expressed frustration about that.

Nicely noted that the NLRB last month rejected a complaint filed by anti-union forces over what they perceived as pro-union statements made by Volkswagen and its German union, IG Metall.

“That set a pretty good precedent, if you ask me,” Nicely said.

Labor law experts said they had little doubt that voters were affected by the comments.

“Having a works council is in the workers' best interest and voting no for a union was not necessarily a good thing,” Art Wheaton, an automotive industry expert at Cornell University's Worker Institute, wrote in an email to The Times. “They were likely influenced by false and misleading statements.”

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Business Headlines

  1. Gas drilling company withdraws application for forced pooling in Western Pennsylvania
  2. Healthy PA expands number of recipients but cuts benefits
  3. Hershey unwraps new corporate logo
  4. Government approves compromise on Corbett’s alternative Medicaid plan
  5. Consumer sentiment improves slightly in August
  6. Google tests Project Wing drone delivery
  7. Dairy Queen victim of malware attack
  8. UPMC to help China build private medical center to boost public care there
  9. McDonald’s attempts to ditch its junk food reputation
  10. Trib 30 stock index gains 4.85% in August
  11. Young adults drive home rental trend in Western Pennsylvania
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.