ShareThis Page

Big Bitcoin exchange vanishes

| Wednesday, Feb. 26, 2014, 12:01 a.m.

TOKYO — The sudden disappearance of one of the largest Bitcoin exchanges only adds to the mystery and mistrust surrounding the virtual currency, which was just beginning to gain legitimacy beyond the technology enthusiasts and adventurous investors who created it.

Prominent Bitcoin supporters said the apparent collapse of the Tokyo-based MtGox exchange was an isolated case of mismanagement that will weed out “bad actors.” But the setback raised serious questions about Bitcoin's tenuous status and even more tenuous future. At least one supporter said the blow could be fatal to Bitcoin's quest for acceptance by the public.

A coalition of virtual currency companies said MtGox went under after secretly racking up catastrophic losses. The exchange had imposed a ban on withdrawals earlier this month.

By Tuesday, its website returned only a blank page. The collapse followed the resignation Sunday of CEO Mark Karpeles from the board of the Bitcoin Foundation, a group seeking wider use of the exotic currency.

San Francisco-based wallet service Coinbase and Chinese exchange BTC China sought to shore up confidence in the currency by saying MtGox's situation was isolated and the result of abusing users' trust. They offered no details.

“As with any new industry, there are certain bad actors that need to be weeded out, and that is what we are seeing today,” the statement said.

Since its creation in 2009, bitcoin has become popular among tech enthusiasts, libertarians and risk-seeking investors because it allows people to make one-to-one transactions, buy goods and services and exchange money across borders without involving banks, credit card issuers or other third parties. Criminals like Bitcoin for the same reasons.

For various technical reasons, it's hard to know just how many people worldwide own Bitcoins, but the currency attracted outsize media attention and the fascination of millions as an increasing number of large retailers such as Overstock.com began to accept it.

Speculative investors have jumped into the Bitcoin fray, too, sending the currency's value fluctuating wildly in recent months. In December, the value of a single Bitcoin hit an all-time high of $1,200. In the aftermath of the MtGox collapse Tuesday, one Bitcoin stood at around $470.

Central banks leery

Central banks across the globe have been hesitant to recognize Bitcoin as a form of money, and Tuesday's vanishing act isn't helping.

MtGox “reminds us of the downside of decentralized, unregulated currencies,” said Campbell Harvey, a professor at the Duke University Fuqua School of Business who specializes in financial markets and global risk management. “There is no Federal Reserve or IMF to come to the rescue. There is no deposit insurance.”

However, Campbell said, MtGox's disappearance “doesn't mean the end of the road” for Bitcoin and other virtual currencies.

The collapse “might represent the end of the ‘wild west,' where anyone can set up shop and deal in crypto-currencies,” he said. But “increasingly sophisticated investors” are funding serious ventures that will “raise both quality and confidence.”

Documents purportedly leaked from MtGox lay out the scale of the problem. An 11-page “crisis strategy draft” published on the blog of entrepreneur and Bitcoin enthusiast Ryan Selkis said that 740,000 Bitcoins were missing from MtGox. That's equivalent to hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of losses, although figures are fuzzy given Bitcoin's extreme volatility.

“At the risk of appearing hyperbolic, this could be the end of Bitcoin, at least for most of the public,” the draft said.

In a post to his blog, Selkis said that the document was handed to him by a “reliable source” and that several people close to the company had confirmed the figures. Reached by phone, he declined to comment further. The Japanese government has not announced any formal investigation.

‘Hammer will come down'

The scandal may cost customers dearly.

At the Tokyo office tower housing MtGox, Bitcoin trader Kolin Burges said he had picketed the building since Feb. 14 after traveling from London in an effort to get back $320,000 he has tied up in Bitcoins with MtGox.

“I may have lost all of my money,” said Burges, next to placards asking if MtGox is bankrupt. “It hasn't shaken my trust in Bitcoin, but it has shaken my trust in Bitcoin exchanges.”

MtGox CEO Karpeles did not immediately return several messages seeking comment. A security officer at the office tower said no one from MtGox was in the building. Tibbane, an Internet company that Karpeles is CEO of, still has its name listed on the building's directory.

“I have no idea” where they are, Burges said. “I'm both annoyed and worried.”

Bitcoin's boosters say the currency's design makes it impossible to counterfeit and difficult to manipulate. But it has struggled to shake off its associations with criminality, particularly its role in powering the now-defunct online drug marketplace Silk Road. Only last month, another member of the Bitcoin Foundation, Vice Chairman Charlie Shrem, was arrested in New York's Kennedy Airport on charges of money laundering.

Authorities have been taking an increasingly hard look at Bitcoin and related virtual currencies, including Litecoin, Namecoin, Ripple and countless others. Some countries, including Russia, have effectively banned the currency. In other jurisdictions, authorities are weighing whether to try to tame the marketplace through licenses or other mechanisms.

Even if MtGox doesn't drag bitcoin down with it, there's fear that the exchange's demise will push financial regulators to take an even more skeptical stance.

“I think this is disastrous from a (regulatory) standpoint,” Selkis said in a message posted to Twitter. “The hammer will now come down hard.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.