Profit falls at American Eagle Outfitters on sales decline, charges
American Eagle Outfitters Inc.'s profit in the fourth quarter tanked on lower sales and one-time charges.
The South Side-based teen-apparel retailer said net income was $10.5 million, or 5 cents a share, in the 13 weeks ended Feb. 1. That compares with net income of $94.8 million, or 47 cents a share, in the 14 weeks ended Feb. 2, 2013.
“The company's results in 2013 were highly disappointing. While tough macro conditions have persisted in our retail sector, our merchandise and overall customer experience fell short of expectations,” interim CEO Jay Schottenstein said in a statement. “We're taking steps to bring greater focus and excitement to our product offering and better engage our core customers.”
After removing one-time write-offs, American Eagle's adjusted net income in the quarter was 27 cents a share, down from 55 cents a share the year before.
Analysts had expected adjusted net income of 26 cents a share, according to Bloomberg.
Sales were $1 billion in the quarter, down from $1.1 billion the year before. Sales at stores open at least a year declined 7 percent.
The company fired CEO Robert Hanson in January after disappointing holiday sales. Schottenstein, the company's chairman and former CEO, took over on an interim basis.
American Eagle expects first-quarter sales to decline and profit to be flat, as “business conditions remain challenging, with severe winter weather contributing to weak demand.”
Alex Nixon is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7928 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.