ShareThis Page

Recall ends honeymoon, opens opportunities for new GM CEO Mary Barra

| Sunday, March 16, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

WASHINGTON — Few chief executive officers would want Mary Barra's job right now.

The company she leads, General Motors, is just five years out from bankruptcy and a government bailout. It is recalling 1.6 million vehicles to fix a faulty ignition switch — a problem the company says it has known about for more than 10 years. Lawmakers in the House and Senate have announced plans for hearings. And there are reports of a probe by the Justice Department.

Barra reportedly learned of the problem after being on the job just a few weeks.

Other CEOs have faced monumental crises this early in their tenure. The Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks happened just four days after Jeffrey Immelt took over as CEO of General Electric. Within two months of Steven Newman becoming CEO of Transocean, its Deepwater Horizon oil well exploded, creating a disastrous spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010.

Still, few CEOs have faced such major internally induced crises as the one Barra confronts at GM.

As a result, it's easy to see nothing but the daunting challenges she faces. On top of managing the recall and the investigations — Barra has said she is personally directing the recall effort — there is the not-so-simple matter of continuing to revamp GM's bureaucratic culture and building on the company's rebound.

In addition, there are the unique challenges given she is this new to the role. She may not yet have made all the changes on her senior team she hoped to make. No new CEO is practiced in the art of being the external face of the company to investors, the media or especially congressional committees. And then there's the tricky tightrope she will need to walk between distancing herself from the past and looking like she is making excuses.

“It doesn't do any good to blame people and settle scores,” said Bill George, a Harvard Business School professor and former CEO of Medtronic.

But for all those thorny challenges, she may have certain things working in her favor. For one, Barra — or any CEO facing a crisis this early in his or her tenure — is likely to be showered with resources and advice from GM's board. Board members don't want the CEO they just put their stamp of approval on to fail, and they do not want to go through the difficult process of naming another chief executive any time soon.

“She actually has more latitude given that it's so new,” said Jim Citrin, who leads the North American CEO practice for the executive search firm Spencer Stuart and is the co-author of the book “You're in Charge. Now What?” “She's still in the honeymoon phase. The board, everybody really, wants to give her the benefit of the doubt. ... There's this perspective capital, this honey­moon capital that she can draw on now.”

The crisis also presents her with several opportunities. Especially for an internally promoted CEO like Barra, who used to be peers with the people she manages, a crisis gives her the chance to establish herself as the one in charge much faster. Everyone immediately looks to the CEO for direction — with some even breathing a sigh of relief it's not them.

“When a crisis hits, you switch from a normal organization to a wartime one,” said Michael Watkins, a professor at the Lausanne, Switzerland-based business school IMD who consults with executives in new leadership roles. “And a war-fighting structure has a four-star general at the top.”

Moreover, she will have the chance to immediately get to know the strengths and weaknesses of her team in ways that a normal business environment wouldn't offer.

“Is there a better way to get to know your team than seeing how they deal with this?” Watkins asks. “One of the key things you do as you're starting as CEO is evaluate the team. This is really going to accelerate that process.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.