Tons of peanut butter being dumped into New Mexico landfill
Nearly a million jars of peanut butter are being dumped in a New Mexico landfill to expedite the sale of a bankrupt peanut-processing plant that was at the heart of a 2012 salmonella outbreak and nationwide recall.
Bankruptcy trustee Clarke Coll said he had no other choice once Costco Wholesale refused to take shipment of the Sunland Inc. product and declined requests to let it be donated to food banks, repackaged or sold to brokers who provide food to institutions such as prisons.
“We considered all options,” Coll said. “They didn't agree.”
Costco officials did not return telephone calls seeking comment.
Court filings indicate the product was made with $2.8 million worth of Valencia peanuts owned by Costco and had been sitting in the warehouse since the company shut down and filed for bankruptcy last fall.
After extensive testing, Costco agreed to a court order authorizing the trustee to sell it the peanut butter. But after getting eight loads, Costco rejected it as “not merchantable” because of leaky peanut oil.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Woman on dating site looks too good to be true: How to vet that pic
- Small retailers at intersection of social networks, foot traffic
- 153-year-old Venango well pumps out oil, history
- Test-tube tuna may be sea change
- Business Council for Peace program works to export profits, peace
- In ‘StockCity,’ real investing like game
- Iron ore price decline hurts U.S. Steel’s cost advantage over rivals
- Pennsylvania unemployment rate drops to six-year low
- Ford: Aluminum-body truck to get 26 mpg
- Oil, gas industry tries to keep talent in pipeline
- U.S. Steel reorganizes operating units