Calif. oil trove trapped
SHAFTER, Calif. — A bustling city is sprouting on five acres here, carved out of a vast almond grove. Tanker trucks and heavy equipment come and go, a row of office trailers runs the length of the site and an imposing 150-foot drilling rig illuminated by football-field-like lights rises over the trees.
It's all been hustled into service to solve a tantalizing riddle: how to tap into the largest oil shale reservoir in the United States.
Across the southern San Joaquin Valley, oil exploration sites have popped up in agricultural fields and on government land, driven by the hope that technological advances in oil extraction — primarily hydraulic fracturing and acidization — can help provide access to deep and lucrative oil reserves.
The race began after the federal Energy Information Administration estimated in 2011 that more than 15 billion barrels of recoverable oil is trapped in what's known as the Monterey Shale Formation, which covers 1,750 square miles, roughly from Bakersfield to Fresno.
But getting at that oil isn't easy. The Monterey shale is unlike other oil shale formations. In those booming oil fields, reserves are pooled in orderly strata of rock. Once the rock is cracked open by fracking or other means, operators can sink a single well with multiple horizontal shafts and pull in oil from a wide area.
California's geology is far more complicated. The earth here has undergone constant seismic reshaping that has folded, stacked and fractured the substrate, trapping the oil in accordion pleats of hard rock at depths of up to 12,000 feet. To reach the crude using conventional methods requires oil companies to drill far-deeper wells, and more of them — a prohibitively expensive undertaking.
To crack the code, companies are busily drilling test wells here, using various fracking and acidization techniques in search of cheaper solutions. So far, no one seems to have found a method to profitably extract the oil.
“Very smart engineers are spending their waking hours trying to come up with the magic formula,” said Rock Zierman, chief executive of the California Independent Petroleum Association, a trade group that has many Monterey shale prospectors among its members.
“What we do know is there is a heck of lot of oil down there,” Zierman said. “What we don't know is how we can get it out of the ground in an economically viable way to justify the heavy investment.”
The shallow, 1,000-foot wells in the established Bakersfield oil patch might cost $100,000 to sink. In the Monterey formation, that expense might run to $5 million, and with every chance of yielding a dry hole.
Despite the difficulty in getting at the oil, the potential bonanza is too big for many oil companies to ignore.
In Kern County — where the bulk of the Monterey formation lies — available land for drilling has nearly all been snapped up. Speculators are believed to be responsible for driving up the cost of obtaining leases.
The leading edge of the exploration boom is pushing Bakersfield's oil patch — which has reliably produced oil for more than 100 years — into long-established agricultural tracts. Oil companies are paying farmers for their water rights, land and, in some cases, buying their homes outright to get at the reserves that might lie underneath.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Small stores take big gamble by not upgrading credit card readers
- Yahoo investors losing patience with ‘star’ CEO Marissa Mayer
- Shopping beacons join list of ‘next big thing’ disappointments
- Amazon raises bar for other retailers with same-day delivery
- GNC suspends sales of products made by indicted company
- Nutritional supplement makers, led by GNC, want to create voluntary safety standards
- Collectors willing to overpay for silver, value ‘all in the eye of the beholder’
- Covestro leader MacCleary finds stability amid change
- Many Black Friday deals not worth the hassle
- Take steps to make it harder for holiday hackers
- Union leaders warn Post-Gazette newsroom of possible layoffs