Programs help to nudge unemployment among veterans downward
The two months that Mark Corbin spent searching for a job were as stressful as his time in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Corbin was retiring after more than seven years in the Army. A government job he had lined up fell through and, after sending out more than 100 applications for everything from retail security to bail bonds jobs, he got barely a response.
“It was a race against the clock to feed my family,” said Corbin, 28, of Monroeville, a husband and father of two.
Then, through a friend of his wife's, he learned that AT&T might have an opening. Not only did he have the required skills, but the company was actively recruiting veterans. He applied, interviewed and was hired as a sales consultant.
“I definitely believe that AT&T saw that (military experience) as a true asset,” he said.
The telecommunications giant hopes to hire 10,000 veterans nationwide in the next five years and is trying to fill 146 positions across Pennsylvania.
Many of those jobs, be it in sales or as technicians, match well with the training veterans had during their service, AT&T spokeswoman Brandy Bell-Truskey said. They are positions that require self-discipline and teamwork, hallmarks of military training.
“We find that the folks in the military have gained skills that are a good fit for AT&T,” Bell-Truskey said. “It's not only the right thing to do, but it makes sense.”
AT&T is not the only company extending a hand to veterans. Amazon and Wal-Mart actively recruit employees with military experience and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce organizes hundreds of job fairs every year through its “Hiring Our Heroes” program.
These efforts have helped nudge unemployment among veterans downward, but people who have recently left the military continue to struggle.
The unemployment rate for veterans last year was 6.6 percent, better than the national rate for civilians of 7.2 percent, according to the Labor Department. Pennsylvania's veteran unemployment was higher at 7.7 percent.
Those who are struggling the most to find work are younger veterans like Corbin. About 9 percent of the 2.8 million Americans who served in the military since September 2001 were out of work last year.
There is a strong link between wartime deployments and veterans' ability to find work, even if nobody knows exactly why, according to economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
War experiences could affect veterans' physical or psychological ability to transition into civilian labor market, Fed economists Jason Faberman and Taft Foster said. The trauma of war could persuade fewer veterans to re-enlist, forcing more people into a civilian labor market when their skills may be better suited to a military career.
Programs that help veterans craft résumés and search for jobs are only part of the solution, experts say. More employers must be convinced that veterans are worth the investment.
“Part of it is having an awareness of the skills that veterans bring,” said James Schmeling, managing director for the Institute for Veterans and Military Families at Syracuse University.
A lot of veterans have worked with heavy machinery, making them a good fit for manufacturing and transportation industries, Schmeling said. Some dealt with highly technical equipment in the service.
More than a third of all veterans end up going into management or some kind of professional occupation, according to Labor Department data. Sales and office occupations make up the next largest proportion of veteran hiring at 17 percent, followed by transportation (16.5 percent), and construction and maintenance jobs (14 percent).
More than half of the 3,600 veterans AT&T hired last year were technicians.
Corbin not only had technical expertise, but he is a good communicator. He worked in the Army as an investigator gathering military intelligence, talking to people. It is why he applied for a sales job.
“Sales is probably my best bet,” he said, “because my job was to talk to people in the military.”
Companies say they want to hire veterans and yet often overlook them if the message doesn't get down to hiring managers, said Dan Goldenberg, executive director for the Call of Duty Endowment, which funds organizations that help veterans find jobs.
Veterans need help beyond what military transition programs offer, which tend to focus on interviewing and resume writing, he said.
Goldenberg has been to job fairs and heard recruiters ask veterans what they want to do. Veterans respond: “I'll do anything,” he said, which is the wrong answer.
“In the military, that's a virtue,” Goldenberg said. “But to recruiters, that's a problem. They think, this is a person who isn't focused.”
AT&T has programs aimed at bridging the divide with veterans. It set up a Military Talent Attraction team, which recruits veterans and also educates store managers on the benefits of hiring them. The company has a military-focused career site, with a “skills translator” tool that lets veterans use their military occupation code to search jobs that might be a good fit for them. The company offers to connect them directly with other employees who are veterans.
Corbin wasn't recruited, as he discovered AT&T through a friend of his wife. But he has been pleased with his experience over the past year and a half since he was hired. He said he is well-paid, feels respected and, next month, begins training for a possible management job.
The biggest support employers can offer veterans is giving them a chance, he said.
“There is no doubt they (veterans) are going to succeed,” Corbin said. “They just have to get the opportunity.”
Chris Fleisher is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7854 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- GOP Senators Rubio, Cruz at odds on tougher surveillance law
- Stocks close quiet week with little change
- Small stores take big gamble by not upgrading credit card readers
- Stop neighbors from stealing your Internet
- Yahoo investors losing patience with ‘star’ CEO Marissa Mayer
- Amazon raises bar for other retailers with same-day delivery
- Self-driving cars met with rule hurdles
- Home rental prices rise at slower pace in October
- ‘Word people’ could start careers as court reporters, medical scribes
- Many Black Friday deals not worth the hassle
- Shopping beacons join list of ‘next big thing’ disappointments