Wall Street logs longest winning streak in 6 months
NEW YORK — The stock market notched its longest winning streak in six months on Monday as another big week for company earnings began.
Halliburton, an oil and gas drilling company, rose after reporting a first-quarter profit on rising revenue in the Middle East and Asia. Toymaker Hasbro gained after saying it returned to profitability in its first quarter. A strong earnings report from Netflix pushed the company's stock higher in after-hours trading.
Close to a third of the companies in the Standard & Poor's 500 index are scheduled to report first-quarter earnings this week, giving investors a better picture of the outlook for demand. Stocks logged their best weekly gain since July last week as companies started reporting their earnings.
“I like what I see in the market,” said Karyn Cavanaugh, a senior market strategist with ING U.S. Investment Management. “It's all going to be about earnings, because earnings are the driver of the market in the long run.”
The S&P 500 index rose 7.04 points, or 0.4 percent, to 1,871.89. The index has risen five consecutive days, its longest streak of gains since October.
The Dow Jones industrial average climbed 40.71 points, or 0.3 percent, to 16,449.25. The Nasdaq composite gained 26.03 points, or 0.6 percent, to 4,121.55.
Stocks got a lift from an encouraging economic report from The Conference Board, which said that its index of leading indicators increased 0.8 percent in March.
“The data are suggesting that we will gain economic momentum,” said Quincy Krosby, a market strategist at Prudential Financial.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Travelers love to hate cheap airlines
- Volkswagen may compensate vehicle owners for loss of value, CEO says
- Safety of credit cards up to banks
- ‘Coffin-nosed Cord’ was ahead of its time
- Majority of House members sign petition calling for vote on Export-Import Bank’s charter
- Stocks wrap best week of year with slight gains
- Miata leaves cutesy behind for sleek
- 2 Fed members push case for rate hike in ’15
- Uncle Charley’s Sausage expands sales to Maryland, Virginia
- UAW ups Fiat Chrysler workers’ pay in new proposal
- PNC fined for paperwork errors on municipal bond offerings