Share This Page

Sunoco Logistics: opposition won't delay pipeline

| Thursday, May 8, 2014, 12:01 a.m.

Local opposition to a Sunoco Logistics Partners Marcellus shale pipeline should not delay the project or add to its cost, the company's president told investment analysts on Wednesday.

Michael J. Hennigan, chief executive of the Philadelphia pipeline company, said the 299-mile Mariner East pipeline project, which would transport natural gas liquids on an existing pipeline to port facilities in Marcus Hook, Delaware County, is moving ahead.

“Obviously whenever you're engaged in a project, you're going to run into some local discussions,” Hennigan said. “We're very confident we can work through those issues with all the townships we've impacted.”

The company's subsidiary, Sunoco Pipeline L.P., has encountered resistance acquiring rights of way along a 50-mile portion of new pipeline in Western Pennsylvania. And some residents in West Goshen Township, Chester County, have objected to its proposal to expand its Boot Road pumping station.

Hennigan said the company's experience converting an existing pipeline to transport natural gas liquids from the Pittsburgh area to Ontario demonstrates the company has a good track record.

Sunoco anticipates the 72,000-barrel-per-day Mariner East project will begin transporting propane this year and ethane next year. The ethane is committed for export to Norway.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.