Fannie, Freddie boast strong 1Q, have fully repaid taxpayers
WASHINGTON — Government-controlled mortgage financiers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac posted solid earnings for the January-March period as the housing market continued to recover. Gains during recent quarters have enabled the companies to fully repay their taxpayer aid from being rescued by the government in 2008.
Fannie Mae reported on Thursday that it earned $5.3 billion in the first quarter. Fannie will pay a dividend of $5.7 billion to the Treasury next month. With its previous payments totaling about $121 billion, Fannie has more than repaid the $116 billion it received from taxpayers.
Freddie Mac posted net income of $4 billion for the first quarter. Freddie, based in McLean, Va., will pay a dividend of $4.5 billion to the government. Freddie had repaid its full government bailout of $71.3 billion after paying its third-quarter 2013 dividend.
The government rescued Fannie and Freddie at the height of the financial crisis in September 2008, when both veered toward collapse under the weight of losses on risky mortgages. The companies received taxpayer aid totaling $187 billion.
The gradual recovery of the housing market has made Fannie and Freddie profitable again. Their repayments of the government loans helped make last year's federal budget deficit the smallest in five years.
Fannie, which is based in the nation's capital, said its first-quarter profit was bolstered by a stable stream of revenue from the fees it charges banks and other mortgage lenders for guaranteeing home loans. The company said it expects “to remain profitable for the foreseeable future.”
The $5.3 billion earnings compared with record net income of $58.7 billion in the same period of 2013. The year-ago figure was mainly because of a one-time accounting move that allowed the company to lower its tax liability by applying losses on delinquent mortgages to its 2013 taxes.
Freddie's $4 billion net income compares with $4.6 billion in the first three months of 2013. Earnings were bolstered in the latest period by a decline in mortgage delinquencies, Freddie said.
Under a federal policy, Fannie and Freddie must turn over their entire net worth above $2.4 billion in each quarter to the Treasury. Fannie and Freddie said their net worth in the first quarter was $8.1 billion and $6.9 billion, respectively.
Fannie and Freddie own or guarantee about half of all American mortgages, worth about $5 trillion. Along with other federal agencies, they back about 90 percent of new mortgages.
The two companies don't directly make loans to borrowers. They buy mortgages from lenders, package them as bonds, guarantee them against default and sell them to investors. That helps make loans available.
President Obama has proposed a broad overhaul of the mortgage finance system — including winding down Fannie and Freddie. The goal is to replace them with a system that would put the private sector, not the government, primarily at risk for the loans.
Two key senators reached agreement in March on a plan that was endorsed by the White House.
The plan by South Dakota Democratic Sen. Tim Johnson, chairman of the banking committee, and Sen. Mike Crapo of Idaho, who is the senior Republican on the committee, would establish a new government insurance fund.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Data make strong case for 401(k)
- Tech companies lay claim to ‘Silicon Beach’
- Health care law compliance complex for employers
- Sometimes, all you need is a reboot
- Fired coal miners find employment in Wyoming
- Underestimated income to cost insured workers
- Good manners relevant when in professional setting
- Trucking firms stretch to hire drivers
- Young watchmaker pursues lifelong fixation
- GAO warns of health site weaknesses
- ‘Airbender’ bent rules of Pa. film tax credit