4 tactics benefit higher ambition
Aiming for higher management in the workplace is a lot like running for political office. Your past and current behaviors will be dissected.
If you want to move up the ladder, you need to know that skeletons in your closet may be discovered.
If that prospect is particularly uncomfortable, you may want to save the heartache and adjust your ambition.
Confident you're skeleton-free or can overcome an unsavory past? Then heed leadership performance experts Antoine Gerschel and Lawrence Polsky: Don't be “blackmailable.” Henceforth, be moral and legal in your business and personal life.
The two partners at PeopleNRG.com suggest three more prime tactics to preserve or establish a leadership-ready reputation.
The next tip, succinctly summarized, is “shut up and do something.”
In other words, do more than expected in your job. Candidates for promotion don't just perform well in the jobs they have. They take on bigger projects, and they don't wait to be asked. They offer.
Third, Gerschel and Polsky say, corporate history shows that people who reach the executive suite are likely to have accepted every challenge presented. For some, that's meant accepting an overseas assignment, a move, or a job change that didn't really fit their personal pleasure. But they did it for the team.
Their fourth big piece of advice is to think and speak in terms of “we,” not “me.” You're more likely to be recognized as leadership material if others see you as a team player. It helps when you're known as someone who adopts, and even cheers for, whatever the corporate priorities are.
In every workplace, you're likely to find people who reached the top without any of the above credentials. Some people are excellent at selling themselves.
But they usually have trouble building fans and followers.
Don't count on following their lead. It's easier the other way.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Norwegian sails into luxury with Prestige purchase
- Fittingly, a party ushers out Revel
- Regulators release details of Highmark’s post-UPMC transition plan
- Foreign firms feel more unwelcome under China regulations
- Netflix offers new way to share recommendations
- Home Depot breach probed
- Halliburton’s $1.1B oil spill settlement may help company avoid billions in payouts
- Google’s corporate products division changes name
- More pipelines proposed to carry Marcellus gas to southeast markets
- Roundup: Area drivers pay less for gasoline; Study to look at financial impact of gas boom; more
- McDonald’s to watch Chinese suppliers