Developers to take input on Oakland plans
A developer purchased property for a project that could include apartments, retail stores and perhaps a hotel on a 1.5-acre block in South Oakland.
Oakland Gateway Ventures hasn't made public its intent for the 12 properties acquired in an area bounded by Bates Street, Boulevard of the Allies, Coltart and Zulema streets. Parking apparently would be underground.
Developer Bill Kane and Robert Dauer, an attorney with Downtown-based Meyer Unkovic & Scott, scheduled a public meeting with residents of the neighborhood for 6 p.m. May 29 in the Peoples Building at 3433 Bates St., said Wanda Wilson, executive director of Oakland Planning and Development.
“Besides the 12 properties the developer has purchased, we are working with the city to acquire some city-owned properties,” said William Bannow of Point View Properties, who is assisting Kane and Dauer.
Bannow said Oakland Gateway Ventures is considering one- and two-bedroom apartments for university students or medical personnel from nearby hospitals. A hotel could be part of the mix, he said.
“We look forward to receiving input on the site from the neighborhood,” said Kane, who declined further comment.
Dauer said the partnership hasn't decided what to do with the properties because it first wants to hear from people.
Kane, who arrived in Pittsburgh from Charlotte, worked with Zambrano Corp. to develop residential units at the former Highland Building in East Liberty, but the project died when Zambrano declared bankruptcy. Since then, Walnut Capital converted the building into apartments, which are fully leased.
Sam Spatter is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at412-320-7843 or email@example.com. Staff writer Tom Fontaine contributed to this report.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.