Probe targets PNC, Citizens
The U.S. Attorney's office in Manhattan is investigating at least five banks over whether they overcharged the government for expenses incurred during foreclosures on federally backed home loans, filings and interviews show.
PNC Financial Services Group Inc., PHH Corp., MetLife Inc., Santander Holdings USA Inc. and Citizens Financial Group Inc., the American unit of Royal Bank of Scotland, disclosed in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission that they've received subpoenas.
PNC and Citizens, Pittsburgh's two largest banks, declined to comment, as did Santander and MetLife. PHH didn't respond to requests for comment.
U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara's office is seeking information on claims on foreclosed loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration or guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, according to records.
The subpoenas, issued years since the height of the foreclosure crisis, seek information about banks' foreclosure-related expenses, which generally include court filings and posting or mailing legal notices.
“You've got a lot of people trying to clean up the servicing industry, but the truth is we are seeing the same servicing problems over and over,” said Ira Rheingold, director of the National Association of Consumer Advocates in Washington. “It was built into the model to charge as many fees as they could.”
At least one of the subpoenas sent to a bank specifically asks about expenses by New York law firms, one person familiar with the matter said.
The probe is being conducted pursuant to the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act, according to Citizens Financial, which on May 12 became the most recent bank to disclose receiving a subpoena. Passed in response to the savings-and-loan crisis of the 1980s, the law has become a key tool of the Justice Department in pursuing cases against banks.
An earlier investigation by Bharara's office of the improper approval of FHA-insured loans relied on FIRREA as well as another law, the False Claims Act, and resulted in $1.1 billion in settlements with JPMorgan Chase & Co., Deutsche Bank AG, Citigroup Inc. and Flagstar Bancorp. In another case being pursued under FIRREA, Bharara's office has been seeking $2.1 billion from Bank of America Corp., which a federal jury last year found liable for fraud over defective mortgages sold by its Countrywide unit to Fannie and Freddie.
About 10 percent of the loans handled by large servicers between 2009 and 2012 were delinquent or in foreclosure, according to industry publication Inside Mortgage Finance. The total amount of the loans is between $6 trillion and $7 trillion.
Representatives for Bharara, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, which oversees FHA, Fannie Mae, and Fannie and Freddie's regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, declined to comment. Freddie Mac spokesman Brad German said the company is aware of the investigation and “cooperating fully.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Experts say economic edge at stake with R&D tax credits
- Regional airlines in tough position
- Missouri barrel sales thrive with bourbon thirst
- Peer-to-peer lenders step into vacuum left by banks
- Has Apple’s watch missed the party?
- Executive exodus continues at GNC with departure of merchandising chief
- Western Pennsylvania health centers granted $1.6M under Obamacare
- Options abound to sell used mobile phones
- Yale, Penn State studies offer conflicting views of fracking
- Kia aspires to be posh
- Theme parks add premium events