Fewer Americans apply for jobless aid
Fewer Americans sought unemployment benefits last week, as the number of people collecting jobless aid fell to its lowest level in more than six years.
The Labor Department on Thursday said that weekly applications for unemployment benefits fell 6,000 to a seasonally adjusted 312,000. The four-week average, a less volatile measure, declined to 311,750.
There are 2.56 million people receiving benefits. That's the lowest total since October 2007, about two months before the recession began.
Jennifer Lee, a senior economist at BMO Capital Markets, said the report, in a “blinding glimpse of the obvious,” is clearly “good news.”
Applications are a proxy for layoffs, so the relatively low number of people seeking benefits shows that employers are letting go of fewer workers. When businesses are confident enough to keep staff, they may also hire more workers.
Job gains are expected to feed stronger economic growth.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Energy sector adjusts to global oil plummet
- Diane Stafford: Consider digital footprint
- Real estate union: Howard Hanna buys Langholz Wilson Ellis
- New York farmers lament lost opportunity for gas riches
- U.S. coal mines nearing record low in worker deaths
- Drought opens Texas ranchers’ eyes to income options
- ‘Staff Pick’ is golden ticket on Kickstarter
- Kim Komando: Can you get a virus on your smartphone?
- 8 Western Pennsylvania hospitals penalized over infections
- Agriculture prospects envisioned in Cuba
- Natural gas groups says increase in Pennsylvania taxes would bring dire results for economy