TribLIVE

| Business

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Government may sue mortgage servicers over inflated 'force-placed insurance' fees

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

On the Grid

From the shale fields to the cooling towers, Trib Total Media covers the energy industry in Western Pennsylvania and beyond. For the latest news and views on gas, coal, electricity and more, check out On the Grid today.

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

By The Associated Press
Wednesday, June 25, 2014, 7:48 p.m.
 

WASHINGTON — The government is considering suing banks and other mortgage servicers over alleged insurance kickbacks that may have cost government-controlled mortgage companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac hundreds of millions, according to an internal federal report.

The agency responsible for guarding the mortgage giants' finances told its inspector general's office that it will decide over the next year whether to sue.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which have been under the agency's conservatorship since 2008, lost an estimated $168 million from the fees in 2012 alone, according to the report.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency did not accept that figure. But the agency said in response to the report that it “does not object” to the recommendation that it consider suing.

The FHFA barred banks and other mortgage servicers from collecting payments from insurers on June 1. But the agency does not normally discuss prospective litigation and has not previously indicated that it might consider suing over past misbehavior.

Should the agency decide to sue, the cases could reopen a controversy over how the biggest banks profited from what is known as “force-placed insurance.”

This high-cost version of property insurance protects the homes of uninsured borrowers. Banks typically buy it when a borrower falls behind on mortgage and insurance payments.

After the 2008 housing bust, force-placed insurance ballooned into a $1 billion-a-year industry.

According to a 2012 investigation by New York's Department of Financial Services and private lawsuits, large banks and insurers colluded to inflate the price of force-placed insurance and split the profits.

Insurers paid banks for referring business. Struggling homeowners and mortgage investors such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bore the cost in the form of higher insurance premiums, often many times the price of normal homeowners insurance.

Because insurance kickbacks are illegal, major banks and insurers allegedly contrived to mask the payments as legitimate business transactions.

The FHFA inspector general's report did not name specific institutions. But some banks, including JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo and Citigroup, set up insurance agencies to accept supposed commissions from the two dominant force-placed insurers, Assurant and QBE.

But as New York and private plaintiff's attorneys separately uncovered, these bank-owned insurance agencies were little more than empty shells.

In one example, JPMorgan's employees stated in court documents that a bank-owned insurance agency did not employ a single insurance agent. In other instances, insurers rewarded banks through generous reinsurance deals or simple, lump-sum multimillion-dollar payments, the state found.

In the wake of New York's investigation, other state probes and private suits, many of the largest mortgage servicers, including JPMorgan, Wells Fargo and Citigroup, renounced commissions in 2012 and 2013.

Those banks and other mortgage servicers that might be subject to such suits declined to comment or did not immediately respond to telephone calls and email messages seeking comment on the threat of litigation.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Business Headlines

  1. Small business hangs on fate of Export-Import Bank
  2. $2-per-gallon gas expected by year’s end, but not in Western Pa.
  3. FirstEnergy to build coal waste processing facility in Beaver County
  4. FedEx faces in-depth probe of bid to buy Dutch express company
  5. Muni bond funds stressed
  6. Jaguar XJ flagship struggles to keep pace
  7. Insurers: F-150’s aluminum costly to repair
  8. Wages, benefits stagnant, U.S. says
  9. Low fuel pressure may have easy fix
  10. Trib 30 index slips in July; 29 percent drop makes ATI biggest loser
  11. ATI to benefit from WTO ruling against China in steel case