Westmoreland County public schools consortium to stick with Highmark
Health insurer Highmark Inc. picked up a commitment on Wednesday from about 12,000 of its members to stick around after they lose in-network access to UPMC at the end of the year.
Westmoreland County Public School Health Care Consortium said it will keep Highmark as its health insurance carrier for the nearly 12,000 school employees and dependents covered under the consortium's health plan.
“The Consortium determined that not only was it the right financial decision for the group to remain with Highmark, but it also enabled its members to stay with a health plan they have come to depend upon for great service,” according to a statement.
Highmark, the state's largest health insurer, has persuaded several large employers in Western Pennsylvania to remain with it through next year by offering discounted premiums and fees.
Others to announce similar decisions include two other school consortiums, Allegheny County and the United Steelworkers union.
To keep full in-network access to UPMC's network of hospitals and doctors after Dec. 31, insurance customers will have to buy plans from UPMC Health Plan, Aetna Inc., Cigna Corp. or United Healthcare.
Alex Nixon is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
Add Alex Nixon to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- W.V. entrepreneurs offer hope as coal fades as economic engine
- Demand for surveillance systems boosts sales for Vector Security
- Cyber Monday increasingly a ‘blah-iday’ as deals rolled out earlier, longer
- Pennsylvania Game Commission reaps revenue from shale gas under game lands
- Distractions can help keep riders alert in self-driving cars, study finds
- Fed slashes its emergency power options in crisis
- Stocks dip on lower holiday spending fears
- IMF adds China’s yuan to basket of top currencies
- University of Pittsburgh researchers revisit war of electric currents
- As historic breakup nears, Alcoa works to redefine its ‘advantage’
- Coke had hand in shaping nonprofit health group, emails show