Vintage clothing retailer ModCloth lays off 70, including 25 in Pittsburgh
Online vintage clothing retailer ModCloth has laid off 70 workers, including 25 in Pittsburgh, as part of a restructuring it said was intended to improve operations.
The job cuts affected positions throughout the company, including its San Francisco headquarters and an office in Los Angeles, said ModCloth spokeswoman Rebecca Silliman. Pittsburgh has the largest location for the company, with more than 300 workers at a fulfillment center and customer care office in Crafton. ModCloth employs 500 people overall.
The job cuts were intended to make ModCloth more efficient, Silliman said. A photography studio in Los Angeles, for example, was merged with the one in Pittsburgh, where it will be based from now on.
ModCloth plans to hire 80 to 100 temporary workers in Pittsburgh during the holidays, Silliman said.
The company was founded in 2002 by two Carnegie Mellon University students, Susan Gregg Koger and Eric Koger. The husband-and-wife duo graduated in 2006 and were named to Forbes “30 under 30” list in the technology companies category several years later.
The privately held company became profitable in 2009 after four back-to-back years of 600 percent annual growth, according to ModCloth's website. It relocated its headquarters to San Francisco in 2010 when Silicon Valley-based Accel Partners became an investor.
Chris Fleisher is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7854 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Smartphones expected to overtake desktops for holiday shopping
- Nutritional supplement makers, led by GNC, want to create voluntary safety standards
- Signs of steady U.S. economy: Pay, home sales up, unemployment applications down
- Many Black Friday deals not worth the hassle
- Take steps to make it harder for holiday hackers
- Union leaders warn Post-Gazette newsroom of possible layoffs
- Stocks finish flat before Thanksgiving holiday; energy firms give back some gains
- Covestro leader MacCleary finds stability amid change
- Existing-home sales fall 3.4% in October
- Retailers, tech stocks push market to strongest week of the year
- Collectors willing to overpay for silver, value ‘all in the eye of the beholder’