Share This Page

1,600 StubHub accounts breached, N.Y. official says

| Thursday, July 24, 2014, 12:01 a.m.

Six people were indicted on Wednesday in an international ring that managed to take over more than 1,000 StubHub users' accounts and fraudulently buy tickets to prime events such as Jay-Z and Elton John concerts, a New York Yankees-Boston Red Sox game and Broadway shows, the Manhattan district attorney said.

District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance Jr. said the thieves would then resell the tickets and split the proceeds.

He said investigators pored over more than 1,600 compromised accounts to trace the accused thieves via IP addresses, PayPal accounts, bank accounts and other financial accounts around the world.

The total stolen, in ticket value, was at least $1.6 million, he said.

In addition to the six people indicted in the New York City case, four others have been arrested internationally: three in London and one in Toronto, under charges in their respective countries, Vance said.

StubHub said it was alerted to “a small number of accounts that had been illegally taken over by fraudsters” last year and the online ticket seller began working with authorities around the world.

StubHub, which is based in San Francisco, said that the thieves didn't break through its security — rather, they got account-holders' login and password information from data breaches at other websites and retailers or from key-loggers or other malware on the customers' computers, spokesman Glenn Lehrman said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.