Citations deal with treatment of fliers
Sometimes airfares are just too good to be true.
Southwest Airlines sent an online offer to about 10 million people in January 2013 for flights from Dallas to Branson, Mo., for a bargain price of $66. But fliers who tried to book the fares couldn't find seats for the sale period — an error the airline blamed on a technical glitch.
Unfair and deceptive practices, such as promoting fares that don't exist, are by far the most common violation of passenger rights by the nation's airlines, according to three years of U.S. Department of Transportation citation records.
The Southwest violation was among more than 500 total citations — resulting in $20.9 million in fines — issued from 2010 to 2013 to all airlines and travel agencies at a time when passengers were howling mad over new airline fees, cramped seating and mergers that cut service to smaller cities.
An analysis of federal citations during that time period also found:
• The most common citation for unfair and deceptive practices was a failure to disclose the full fare for a flight, including taxes.
• The steepest penalties were imposed against airlines that mistreated disabled passengers.
• Only about half the fines imposed by the Department of Transportation were collected, with the balance either suspended or directed to be used to improve airline services.
In response to an outcry from passengers, the Department of Transportation cracked down on violators and adopted new passenger rights rules that took effect in 2010.
In addition to requirements to advertise full fares, the new rules impose hefty fines on airlines that strand passengers on the tarmac for hours. Airlines must also refund checked-bag fees for lost luggage and give customers bumped from overbooked flights compensation of as much as $1,300, up from the previous maximum of $800.
These new rules focus primarily on the treatment of passengers — not on safety or mechanical issues, which are regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration.
With renewed attention on passengers, the number of citations issued by the Department of Transportation nearly doubled. From 2010 to 2013, the number of citations imposed on airlines averaged 54 a year, compared with the average of 28 for the previous four years, according to federal citation records.
Although passenger rights groups have welcomed the changes, some airline critics believe the new rules don't go far enough and are calling for steeper fines to change the behavior of repeat violators.
“I don't think these fines do anything to mitigate or stop the bad behavior,” said Albert Rizzi, a blind traveler who was kicked off a US Airways plane in November 2013 when a flight attendant complained that his service dog had wandered into the aisle. “There are no consequences involved.”
Of the 521 violations in 2010-13, the department cited airlines 181 times for violating rules of unfair and deceptive practices, such as Southwest's nonexistent discount airfares to Branson, according to agency records.
In each violation, the airlines and travel agencies signed consent orders to settle the allegations of wrongdoing raised by the Department of Transportation to avoid civil litigation.
Ten months after Southwest was cited for promoting those fares, the department fined the airline $200,000 for running television ads touting another super-low fare from Atlanta that did not exist — another error, according to the airline.
A rule requiring airlines to advertise the full cost of a flight took effect in January 2012. Since then, violations of the rule have led the federal agency to fine the nation's airlines and travel agencies 57 times.
For example, American Airlines advertised in February 2013 that children fly “free” as part of a ski resort package. But the fine print said only the airfare charges were free — travelers still had to pay taxes and fees.
American Airlines agreed to a $20,000 fine but disputed that it had broken any rules.
Congress is now considering a bill, supported by most airlines, that would eliminate the full-fare rule, allowing airlines and travel agencies to advertise fares and fees separately.
The House passed the bill last Monday. So far there is no companion bill in the Senate.
The heftiest fines — nearly four times higher than the average penalty — were issued to airlines that neglected or mistreated disabled passengers, according to federal records.
Delta Air Lines has been assessed the largest fine — $2 million — for 22 violations from 2007 to 2011.
In one incident in New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport, a disabled 79-year-old woman said she was left unattended in a terminal for more than two hours because she declined to pay a Delta worker $10 to push her wheelchair.
Delta paid $750,000 of the fine. The balance was credited to the airline for money it spent to improve services for disabled passengers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ATI to benefit from WTO ruling against China in steel case
- Cost-cutting at Kraft Heinz extends to refrigerator
- GNC to convert more stores to franchises as sales, profits slip
- Muni bond funds stressed
- Post-Gazette offers voluntary buyouts in bid to avoid layoffs
- Kennametal expects to consolidate plants as it shrinks manufacturing in continuing streamlining; profit drops
- U.S. asks Supreme Court to reinstate convictions of portfolio managers who won on appeal
- Home rental prices jumped again in June
- Facebook ready to test giant drone
- Economy’s 2Q best since last year
- Invasive beetle costs Pittsburgh-area power companies plenty