HP to pay $32.5M to settle Postal Service dispute
Hewlett-Packard Co. has agreed to pay $32.5 million to settle allegations it overcharged the Postal Service for products over more than eight years.
In the dispute, the Postal Service alleged that HP failed to comply with pricing terms of its contract with the Postal Service, including a requirement that HP provide prices that were no greater than those offered to its other customers with comparable contracts.
The Justice Department said the claims resolved by the settlement are allegations only, and there's been no determination of liability.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Coal official: Number of W.Va. mining sites falls to 96
- Profit falls at vitamin retailer GNC Holdings in third quarter
- ‘Airbender’ bent rules of Pa. film tax credit
- Strengthening U.S. growth reflects help from Federal Reserve
- How to avoid Amazon and still get deals
- Radiation detection of drilling waste nearly set at W.Va. landfills
- Sweet tooth will cost you more next year
- Mylan’s 3Q profit triples on strong U.S. sales
- Highmark’s new REMWorks Sleep Store will sell sleep apnea equipment
- Hedge funds sue to block EDMC deal
- Bayer profit edges higher, raises forecasts