Apple, Samsung call cease-fire in most countries
The seemingly never-ending global patent war between rivals Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co. may finally be coming to an end.
In a sign that they might have realized the futility of years of patent litigation, the two companies released a joint statement confirming they have agreed to a cease-fire outside of this country.
“Apple and Samsung have agreed to drop all litigation between the two companies outside the United States,” the statement said. “This agreement does not involve any licensing arrangements, and the companies are continuing to pursue the existing cases in U.S. courts.”
The patent litigation between the companies stems from Apple's assertion several years ago that Samsung essentially copied the iPhone as it tried to claw its way back into the smartphone market. For its part, Samsung has alleged that Apple infringed on some of its wireless transmission patents.
Under the agreement, the companies are dropping lawsuits in South Korea, Japan and Germany, among other locations. While this detente seems to signal a winding down of legal hostilities, the companies have significant litigation pending in the United States.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Demand for surveillance systems boosts sales for Vector Security
- Cyber Monday increasingly a ‘blah-iday’ as deals rolled out earlier, longer
- Fed slashes its emergency power options in crisis
- Distractions can help keep riders alert in self-driving cars, study finds
- Pennsylvania Game Commission reaps revenue from shale gas under game lands
- IMF adds China’s yuan to basket of top currencies
- Stocks dip on lower holiday spending fears
- University of Pittsburgh researchers revisit war of electric currents
- Energy Spotlight: Minking Chyu
- As historic breakup nears, Alcoa works to redefine its ‘advantage’
- Many Black Friday deals not worth the hassle