Highmark denies premiums in federal insurance marketplaces affected by level of competition
Highmark Inc. charges 80 percent more for insurance coverage on the federal insurance marketplace in West Virginia than it does for similar coverage in Western Pennsylvania but said the price in the neighboring state is not related to a lack of competition.
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, a Princeton, N.J., nonprofit that funds health care research, released a study this month that found states with less competition among insurers in online marketplace have higher premiums than in states with more carriers.
But Fred Earley, president of Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield West Virginia, said two factors are responsible for the price differences. West Virginians are generally more unhealthy, and prices are lower in Pittsburgh because Highmark sells a limited-network plan, Community Blue.
“When we priced, we did price to be competitive because we wanted to be successful,” Earley said. “We were surprised as anybody that we were going to be the only carrier on the exchange.”
The Pittsburgh-based insurer is the only insurance carrier selling health plans on Healthcare.gov in West Virginia this year. A 27-year-old in Charleston paid $250.19 a month for the second-lowest cost silver plan.
In Pittsburgh, where Highmark is competing against UPMC and Aetna Inc., the same plan cost $139.38. In the Harrisburg area, where Highmark was one of four insurers competing on the exchange, the premium is $167.67.
In Delaware, where Highmark and Aetna are the only insurance providers in the marketplace set up under the Affordable Care Act, the monthly premium is $237.15, or 70 percent higher than in Western Pennsylvania.
Community Blue, which isn't offered outside Pennsylvania, excludes UPMC from its network and has premiums that can be 20 percent less expensive. Highmark's lowest cost silver plan that includes UPMC in-network access costs $193.43, or 39 percent more a month than Community Blue.
Highmark's dominance of the insurance market makes it difficult for other carriers to enter and compete, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation said.
“Whether West Virginia will attract more competitors is unclear,” the report's authors wrote. “It is difficult for insurers such as Aetna/Coventry and United to compete successfully in West Virginia because they cannot contract with West Virginia hospitals at rates as low as Highmark.”
In America's Health Rankings, a project of United Healthcare's charitable foundation, West Virginia ranked 46 out of the 50 states for the poor health of its residents in 2013. It had the second highest rate of smoking among adults and the second highest rate of physical inactivity.
Pennsylvania ranked 29th; Delaware ranked 31st.
“We consume a lot of health care resources” in West Virginia, Earley said.
Timothy McBride, a health economist and professor at Washington University in St. Louis, agreed with the foundation's findings. His research on differences in exchange pricing concludes that greater competition leads to lower premium costs.
He examined premiums in all 500 rating areas around the country. The 50 areas with the highest costs all had similar characteristics — mostly rural, higher mortality and few insurance carriers.
While health status, income levels and other demographic factors influence insurance costs, McBride said his research found that the strongest factor affecting price is number of insurers.
“We would expect that with more insurers, the price would start dropping,” he said.
Alex Nixon is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7928 or email@example.com.
Add Alex Nixon to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Union leaders warn Post-Gazette newsroom of possible layoffs
- Covestro leader MacCleary finds stability amid change
- Mall stores required to open for Thanksgiving
- ‘Word people’ could start careers as court reporters, medical scribes
- Pfizer acquires Allergan in $160B deal
- Deaf business owners overcome trials
- Coke had hand in shaping nonprofit health group, emails show
- Black Friday loosens its hold on the holiday season
- Feds upgrade GDP’s growth
- Stocks shake off Middle East tensions, drop in consumer confidence
- German financial giant Allianz SE slashes coal investments