Auto market booming, but longer loan terms cause concern
WASHINGTON — Automobile sales are sizzling, in part because Americans increasingly are taking out longer and longer loans to purchase used and new vehicles.
That American consumers are unleashing pent-up demand after holding off on buying new cars is good news. But it may be a problem that many of these purchases are made with loans that stretch over long periods of time, many extending well beyond the four-year period when many Americans trade in their vehicles.
“We're seeing a lot of subprime loans, loans that are over 10 percent interest, and very long-term loans, as long as 72 months, which lowers the monthly payment,” said Michelle Krebs, the director of automotive research for AutoTrader.com.
Four-year car loans used to be the norm, which then became five-year loans. From April through June of this year, 41 percent of new-car loans were for financing largely about six years, according to data from the credit analysis firm Experian.
About 14 percent of used car loans were for periods between six and seven years, the Experian data shows.
“A lot of times the car dies long before they can pay off the loan, or there is an expensive repair that they can't afford, so they trade it in,” said Rosemary Shahan, the president of the California-based consumer advocacy group Consumers for Auto Reliability and Safety.
“The loans are disproportionate to the value of the car. The car is a depreciating asset, and it is going to be worth even less as time goes on, and that negative equity gets rolled into the next loan.”
The long-term loans could result in snowballing debt.
“It's something we keep an eye on,” said Melinda Zabritski, the senior director of automotive finance for Experian, which shared the quarterly data with McClatchy. “Consumers are certainly trying to keep the payments as low as possible in a market where vehicles are becoming more expensive.”
Business is booming for new-car sales, with projections of at least 16.3 million vehicles this year.
Beside lower monthly payments with longer-term loans, another factor in those sales is pent-up demand. The average age of an American car or light truck on the road is 11.4 years, up from 9.8 years a decade ago. That suggests consumers had put trade-ins on hold, insecure about their jobs. Now they're trading in those old cars.
“I think people are finally deciding to pull the trigger,” said Dennis Carlson, the deputy chief economist for credit analysis firm Equifax. “Consumers who were on the fence feel now is a pretty good time to get a car.”
Borrowers with weaker credit scores, however, pay higher interest rates, so they take on longer-term loans to bring down those rates, prompting concern that this kind of lending could end with a market crater, much like the mortgage-finance meltdown that began in 2007.
“There is a great debate about whether it's a bubble and whether it's going to burst,” said Krebs, of Autotrader.com, adding that on a key metric there's no evidence of a problem yet. “The delinquency rate on car loans is very low.”
About 2.39 percent of auto loans were 30 days late during the second quarter of this year. Also, 0.62 percent of car loans were 60 days late, according to Experian.
Those delinquency rates are quite low, and automotive lending differs from mortgage lending in a key way: Lenders can quickly reclaim cars that have loans in default. Repossession companies come to a borrower's home or work site, load the vehicle on a tow truck and take it back.
From April through June, 0.61 percent of vehicles with outstanding loans were repossessed. That's a small number but still worrisome, because it was a jump of more than 70 percent over the first-quarter rate of 0.36 percent.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Cranberry-based Prodigo Solutions: Hospitals can reduce high supply costs
- With acquisition, PNC set to enter IPO market
- Allegheny Health Network expands women’s services in competition with UPMC
- Consumer spending climbs as job gains boost incomes
- Another card system hack at Supervalu, Albertsons
- State cites Patriot Coal in W.Va. mine accident
- Jobless baby boomers struggle to get back in game
- Stocks decline on overseas political troubles
- Look for strengths before writing off employees
- Study: Wellness programs don't save money, but employee health improves
- RadioShack decline belies its longevity