ShareThis Page

Shell certified as environmentally conscious driller

| Wednesday, March 18, 2015, 12:01 a.m.
Justin Merriman | Tribune-Review
A common site throughout Washington County and other parts of Western Pennsylvania, an active gas drilling site sits on a small hillside surrounded by homes.

A partnership between environmentalists and shale gas producers awarded its second certification to an energy company for meeting the group's voluntary standards for environmentally conscious drilling in Appalachia, signaling progress in an effort some critics complained was slow to develop.

Royal Dutch Shell and the Center for Sustainable Shale Development planned to announce Wednesday that the company met the partnership's 15 standards for protecting air and water during gas drilling and production. In September, Chevron became the first company to gain certification.

“I think it manifests that we're really moving forward on what we said we were going to do,” said Susan LeGros, who became executive director of the Downtown center a year ago, just after it began accepting applications for certification.

Shell and Chevron are among four shale companies that founded the center with groups such as the Pennsylvania Environmental Council and The Heinz Endowments with the goal of building a bridge between industry and nonprofits, and setting environmental standards separate from government regulations.

“Our certification is external recognition of the tremendous strides Shell has made in this space over the last several years,” Mike DeWitt, general manager for Shell's operations in Appalachia, said in a statement.

Outside auditing firm Bureau Veritas reviewed how the company follows standards for limiting environmental impacts, and visited 17 well pads and other field operations in Tioga County. Shell, one of the largest energy companies in the world, is Pennsylvania's 12th biggest shale gas producer, with 337 active wells as of Dec. 31.

Critics have said the few certifications awarded by the center, to founding companies only, show a lack of support. Center leaders say they set tough standards that take time to meet, and that others will seek certification.

“This demonstrates that organizations with opposing views can work together. It's hard work, but through rational, fact-based conversation, we can reach common ground, and in the process, pull the whole industry forward in terms of responsibly developing resources,” said Michael Crothers, vice president of Shell North America Unconventionals.

The other industry participants in the center are Cecil-based Consol Energy Inc. and Downtown-based EQT Corp. Consol said in January it completed the audit process. EQT spokeswoman Linda Robertson said Tuesday the company plans to apply this spring.

The center keeps applicants secret until they attain certification, so LeGros declined to say if others have applied.

“I think all the participants in CSSD, not just the industry but the (nonprofits), are actively talking to their peers about how important the work we're doing is,” she said of efforts to recruit more companies and funders.

LeGros has pushed to find more foundations to join the center since new leadership at The Heinz Endowments withdrew its support last year. She said she has made progress but could not identify potential funders.

As it reviews companies for certification, the center is adjusting standards. Last month, it changed a water standard to allow companies to send wastewater from drilling to specialized treatment facilities.

Certification is valid for two years.

David Conti is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.