ShareThis Page

Restructuring costs weigh down Alcoa 2Q profit

| Wednesday, July 8, 2015, 5:15 p.m.

Alcoa Inc. posted flat second-quarter profits Wednesday largely because of restructuring charges from closing high-cost smelters and mines around the world caused by declining global demand and prices for aluminium.

But profit from its business with aerospace and auto­motive companies was up, highlighting the effectiveness of the company's strategy to focus on higher-value parts for those growing industries.

And a key acquisition in that shift to supplying the aerospace industry — the $1.5 billion purchase of Moon-based titanium-maker RTI International Metals Inc. — is on track to close at the end of this month, Alcoa CEO Klaus Kleinfeld said Wednesday.

“This was a strong quarter and shows that the transformation is right on,” Kleinfeld told analysts on a conference call.

Aerospace revenue jumped 29 percent during the quarter, compared with the same quarter last year, the company said. Shipments of aluminum sheet for cars and trucks rose 200 percent, Alcoa said.

Those gains in value-added products led to organic revenue growth of 12.9 percent, which offset an 11.7 percent drop in revenue caused by closing production facilities.

During the quarter, the company announced closure of a coal mine and power station in Australia, plans to sell operations in Suriname, and shuttering of a smelter in Brazil.

“We really are transforming the company,” Kleinfeld said. “We're building a lightweight multi-material company and creating a globally competitive commodity business.”

Revenue in the quarter was $5.9 billion, up 1 percent from $5.8 billion in the same quarter last year.

Net income in the quarter that ended June 30 was $140 million, or 10 cents per share, compared with $138 million, or 12 cents per share, in the same period a year ago.

Not counting $110 million in one-time charges, primarily because of the facility closures, adjusted net income was $250 million, or 19 cents a share, up 16 percent from a year ago.

The results missed predictions by analysts, who were expecting adjusted net income of $282 million, or 22 cents a share, according to Bloomberg data.

John Tumazos, of Tumazos Very Independent Research in Holmdel, N.J., said recent aluminum price declines hurt Alcoa's results more than expected.

“Given how much the aluminum price fell, they did well not to lose money,” he said.

And the falling prices are likely to weigh heavily on earnings the rest of this year, he said. “There's a good chance they won't make a profit in the third and fourth quarter.”

Alex Nixon is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7928 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.