Consol cuts natural gas budget again
Consol Energy Inc. again cut its budget for spending on natural gas exploration and production because of continued low prices, though it won't rule out drilling a few new wells in 2016.
The Cecil-based gas and coal producer on Wednesday announced a new capital budget plan and annual production estimates before a two-day financial conference in Miami. The budget of between $205 million and $325 million is less than the $400 million to $500 million it previously said it would spend, and well short of the $1.3 billion budget from 2014.
Most major Marcellus and Utica shale gas producers slashed spending during the past year. Natural gas prices recently hit 15-year lows because of a glut in supplies, inadequate pipelines to carry it to better markets and tepid demand. Consol last year halted its drilling program to focus on fracking and completing already-drilled wells.
The company said it still could increase gas production by 15 percent this year while spending less because it has become more efficient at bringing wells online. Wells tapping the Utica shale beneath the Marcellus are producing huge amounts of gas at lower costs, and Consol officials said they might drill some Utica wells from existing pads. The company recently got clearance to drill a Utica well from one of its Marcellus well pads at Pittsburgh International Airport.
Consol's largest shareholder, Memphis-based Southeastern Asset Management, raised its stake to 23 percent of shares from 21 percent, according to a Securities and Exchange Commission filing on Wednesday.
David Conti is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-388-5802 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.