Share This Page

Aluminum maker Alcoa tapers U.S. smelting, refining capacity

| Thursday, Jan. 7, 2016, 10:48 p.m.

Alcoa Inc. is cutting more smelting and refining capacity in the United States as the aluminum maker grapples with falling aluminum prices and overcapacity around the globe, primarily in China.

The capacity reductions, the latest in a string of cuts that started last year as the company prepares to separate its aluminum production business from its high-value parts operation, will result in layoffs for more than 1,200 workers in Indiana and Texas. The parts business supplies components primarily for the automotive and aerospace industries.

Alcoa said it will close its Warrick Operations smelter in Evansville, Ind. by the end of March, and lay off 600 workers. A rolling mill and power plant at Warrick will remain open.

The company will temporarily halt all refining at its Point Comfort, Texas, facility by the end of June, affecting 670 employees.

“Despite the hard work of employees, these assets are not competitive,” Roy Harvey, president of Alcoa's Global Primary Products business, said in a written statement. “We're confident that these actions are the right ones in face of these challenging market conditions.”

Aluminum prices dropped 30 percent last year, and alumina prices fell 40 percent, the company said. At the same time, aluminum production around the world has remained high, said John Tumazos, an analyst and owner of Tumazos Very Independent Research in Holmdel, N.J.

Global output in November was the third-largest monthly total ever, Tumazos said, and Chinese production was up 16.5 percent through November, compared with the same period in 2014.

Alcoa's capacity reductions are a “natural reaction to low prices,” he said. “I think they're just saying, ‘The market looks worse. The prices are bad. We're going to produce less.' ”

With the Warrick closure, Alcoa will have shuttered three of its five smelters in the United States. In November, the company announced it was closing two smelters in Washington state and one in New York. But after officials in New York offered Alcoa incentives to reduce costs at the Massena West smelter, the company agreed to keep it open.

Including the Warrick smelter, Alcoa has shuttered 24 percent of its global smelting capacity since starting a review of high-cost production in March.

The Point Comfort facility was Alcoa's only U.S. alumina refinery. The company has cut 19 percent of global refining capacity since March.

Alcoa said it will record a charge of $120 million, or 9 cents a share, in the fourth quarter related to the latest closures. It expects to record a charge of $50 million to $60 million in the first quarter.

The company will report its fourth-quarter financial results on Monday.

Alcoa is planning to split into two companies in the second half of next year, separating its mining, refining and smelting operations from faster-growing businesses that produce high-value parts for the automotive and aerospace industries.

Tumazos said the capacity reductions should not affect the viability of the primary metals company, which will retain the Alcoa name. Despite the weakness in its markets, it should be in good financial shape because the parts-manufacturing company, which has not been named, will retain Alcoa's debt.

“I don't think this affects the spinoff,” he said.

Alex Nixon is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7928 or anixon@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.