ShareThis Page

Consol posts lower profit on tumbling gas, coal prices

| Friday, Jan. 29, 2016, 7:57 a.m.
Consol Energy Inc.'s pad No. 2 in Findlay is part of the natural gas development at Pittsburgh International Airport.
Jasmine Goldband | Tribune-Review
Consol Energy Inc.'s pad No. 2 in Findlay is part of the natural gas development at Pittsburgh International Airport.

Consol Energy Inc. spent 84 days and $9 million drilling the first of four wells into the Utica shale from a pad in Monroe County, Ohio. By the fourth well, drillers got it down to 30 days for less than $5 million.

Tim Dugan, the company's chief operating officer for gas, predicts drilling wells in the high-pressure, high-production layer beneath the Marcellus shale will be done for less than $4 million and in fewer than 23 days.

“We expect the same level of cost improvement in the rest of our dry Utica areas,” he told analysts Friday while discussing financial results from the last three months of 2015 and plans to increase gas production this year.

Such cost-cutting in the gas and coal sides of Consol's business, combined with a 35 percent boost in gas production, helped the Cecil-based company offset tumbling revenue from low prices and weak demand for both products.

Consol reported net income of $30.4 million, or 13 cents per share, during the fourth quarter of 2015, less than half the profit of $73.7 million, or 32 cents per share, it posted in the same period a year before.

Prices and demand for both of its primary products fell through 2015, pushing Consol to slash capital spending, lay off workers mid-year and stop drilling wells. This month, the company idled one of its five longwall mining sections in the Bailey coal mine complex beneath Greene and Washington counties as it dialed back production estimates for 2016 to a 15 percent rise.

Consol cut total costs and expenses during the fourth quarter by nearly 30 percent to $603 million. But total revenue fell by 18 percent compared with the same period a year before as a warm start to winter cut coal demand from power plants and natural gas prices fell to 16-year lows in December.

“It's truly an unprecedented time in every way, shape and form,” CEO Nick DeIuliis said.

Analysts and investors saw positives in Consol's moves to reduce costs while getting more gas from wells, especially in the Utica shale. Its stock, which lost more than 80 percent of its value last year, jumped more than 17 percent Friday to $7.94.

“They are continuing to drill fantastic wells,” said analyst Neal Dingmann of SunTrust Robinson Humphrey in Houston. Consol's moves to shore up its balance sheet by cutting capital spending and to hedge some future sales prices also were good signs, he said.

“They have some stability that others don't have,” Dingmann said.

Consol is not seeking to sell assets as aggressively as it had several months ago, DeIuliis said. It still doesn't plan to drill more wells in 2016 as it focuses on bringing online 67 wells that were previously drilled but not completed. But if prices improve and provide more cash, the company could drill more Utica wells.

“We believe we're positioned to ride out this environment,” DeIuliis said

On the coal side, Consol cut production costs by about $3 per ton to just under $42 as average sales prices fell 13 percent to $52.57 per ton of thermal coal — used at power plants — and to $48.41 per ton of metallurgical coal used to make steel.

David Conti is the assistant business editor at the Tribune-Review. Reach him at 412-388-5802 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.