Alpha Natural Resources says lenders offer $500M for coal, gas assets
This Thursday, Jan. 21, 2016 photo shows the Belle Ayr Mine near Gillette, a northeastern Wyoming coal town where owner Alpha Natural Resources has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
Photo by AP
Alpha Natural Resources said it has received a $500 million offer from existing lenders for the potential sale of the bankrupt coal producer's core assets.
A filing Monday in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Richmond said the unspecified lenders agreed to serve as the lead bidder. The offer would set the floor for an auction process that lets competitors make higher bids.
Bristol, Va.-based Alpha filed for Chapter 11 protection in August. Since the filing, the company has announced plans to lay off hundreds of workers in central Appalachia, citing tough market conditions.
“As part of our overall restructuring effort, we believe this process will provide the best chance of preserving jobs and maximizing the value of the broader enterprise for all stakeholders,” Alpha said in a statement Tuesday.
The offer includes all Alpha coal assets in Pennsylvania and Wyoming; the McClure and Toms Creek mine properties in Virginia; and the Nicholas mine property in West Virginia. It includes the company's natural gas holdings in Pennsylvania's Marcellus shale and its interest in a coal export terminal in Newport News, Va.
The Pennsylvania operations include the Cumberland mine near Waynesburg and 30 producing shale gas wells.
The deadline to submit competing offers is March 28. A judge would have to approve any final sale.
Alpha's filing said the company hopes to emerge from bankruptcy by the end of June.
Other U.S. coal operators that have filed for bankruptcy include St. Louis-based Arch Coal and Scott Depot, W.Va.-based Patriot Coal. Most of Patriot's operating assets were sold to Lexington, Ky.-based Blackhawk Mining LLC.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.