| Business

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Budget cut plans push D.C. to edge

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

On the Grid

From the shale fields to the cooling towers, Trib Total Media covers the energy industry in Western Pennsylvania and beyond. For the latest news and views on gas, coal, electricity and more, check out On the Grid today.

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Thursday, Feb. 28, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

What a thrilling week it has been with a phony doomsday in the air. If you aren't in business.

If you are in business, it's just another week of wondering what the government will do next. The suspense never stops. New mischiefs in health care regulation, new penalties for coal, a $9 minimum wage — pour it on, politicians.

Government's zigs and zags have become the big uncertainty for business. Not the fickle marketplace as a whole, nor the weather, the fashions or the flu. But government.

The doom of choice this week has been the budget “sequester,” an across-the-board cut in federal spending. Will it happen, or won't it?

Just a 2.3 percent cut, $85 billion in total.

And this in total spending of $3.5 trillion-odd. But cut that little bit, says the president, and you'll see vast damage. Little children will miss their Head Start. First responders perhaps won't get to fires, floods and crime scenes in time. Up to 750,000 jobs may be lost.

All this from a $23 trim in $1,000 of spending.

Which just proves that no amount of budget-cutting can be tolerated in Washington, the unrivaled capital of government jobs, without the drapery of doomsday being hung.

Famed economist Milton Friedman long ago recommended that government spending be whacked 10 percent. He said Cabinet officers would find the ways to trim the least important programs, priorities and people. Today this would mean $350-odd billion out of a year's outlays. And in a very few years, we'd see budget balance and at least a start in paying down the $17 trillion national debt.

Nothing so ambitious has a chance of happening. But wouldn't it give a boost to business confidence, plant expansions, construction, and hiring, and bolster consumers' and investors' confidence in the dollar? A new age of prosperity might dawn if we'd get a leash on the spending tiger that threatens to chew up American prosperity as we've known it.

True, there is some economic downside to any cut in spending, even by government. The upsides just weigh more.

Yet the White House this past Monday staged a conference call of administration officials to brief media all around the country on “the devastating impact the sequester will have on jobs and middle class families ... if Republicans in Congress fail to compromise to avert the sequester by March 1.”

That's tomorrow. By now, with doom drummed into constituents' ears all week, Republicans already may have caved on the “compromise” — another tax on upper income folks, including many in business.

If so, the GOP will have missed an opportunity — maybe its last — to move the heavy train of government spending back a few inches at least. It's a shame that half the cuts are targeted to national defense, but there is undoubtedly some fat even there.

Other rollbacks are positively tempting. Such as pay and pension levels for federal employees far in excess of private sectors norms. And subsidies for corn-based ethanol that raise the price of food while doing zilch for the environment. A Head Start for needy children wouldn't help nearly as much as a Better Beginning — in two-parent families, which this government perversely discourages. What business person would figure that?

Jack Markowitz is a Thurseday columnist for Trib Total Media. Email

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Stories

  1. Kang’s 9th-inning home run gives Pirates wild victory over Twins
  2. Officials identify pregnant woman shot, killed in Brighton Heights
  3. School credit ratings a problem for several in Western Pennsylvania
  4. Rossi: ‘Hockey guy’ Sutter will be missed
  5. Steelers’ Wheaton adjusting his game moving to slot receiver
  6. Steelers RB Le’Veon Bell gets suspension, fine reduced
  7. 5 face trial in beating of black man in Pittsburgh
  8. Pirates notebook: Prospect Tucker unaware of ‘trade’ frenzy
  9. Hempfield cyclist to cool wheels in jail during appeal
  10. ATI workers retire early to ensure pension
  11. Penguins trade Sutter to Canucks, sign free agent center Fehr