IMF just can't leave us alone
A rebellious impulse arises to tell Christine Lagarde to mind her own business.
Trouble is, her business is the world's business.
Lagarde is managing director of the International Monetary Fund, which lends to countries in financial trouble. U.S. taxpayers put up the most money.
And there was French native Lagarde the other day telling the United States to quit obsessing about budget deficits so much. Focus on growth and jobs, she said. And ditto for Europe's debtors.
Now Lagarde may or may not have been right. But who asked her?
The people of the United States are big enough to handle, or mishandle, their own business. Likewise the many peoples of Europe, though some have gone out of the habit of work while their welfare states have gone bust.
But that's the “global economy” for you. It's your international duty to prosper. And you get these bureaucrats without borders scolding if you don't.
Lagarde released her inner nag in advance of a policy bash of planetary proportions. The finance ministers and central bankers of the 20 major economies gathered last week in Washington. Icing on the cake for the four-star hotels came the spring meeting of the IMF's sister do-gooding World Bank, 188 nation-members.
It is gospel on such occasions that government is the tool that fine-tunes how manufacturing and job markets will go. Likewise shopping, home building, and everything else that moves in an economy.
The possibility that government mostly gets in the way does not loom large over the conference tables.
The global economy has been stubborn of late. Policy can't seem to get it humming. The IMF went so far as to lower its world forecast. Cuts in government spending will slow U.S. growth, it sniffed. And “austerity” budgets mean continued recession in the euro zone.
World Bank President Jim Yong Kim said global growth is still too weak even as a “world without poverty” has become feasible (presumably with our money). Put an “expiration date,” he said loftily, to anybody anywhere having to live dirt poor.
Lagarde unleashed some diplomacy at the clumsiness of U.S. budgeting by way of across-the-board “sequester.” Use “better quality” reductions, she advised, measures that won't delay job creation.
This possibly was a reference to how much damage our own public servants are doing with the sequester cuts they've been given.
To save a relatively few bucks — $85 billion in $3.5 trillion total spending — they're mean enough to cancel White House public tours. The furloughing of air traffic controllers that disrupts thousands of flights is in a class of spite all its own. As if there's no fat in government departments, the cuts are forced to happen uncannily close to the bone.
And yet countless government policies work against job creation even as budget stimulus aims to quicken it.
Think of the regulatory cancer that has grown over the decades, discouraging every new job: the minimum wage-setting, tax withholding and anti-discriminatory, safety and environmental hoops to jump through. And hey, Obamacare's coming, a new era of complexity. In Europe, too, it's almost impossible for companies to fire anybody.
Alas, Madame Lagarde, employers have reasons to be slow to hire.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Hospital finances still crying ‘ouch’
- Rossi: Brawl for ADs between Pitt and WVU
- No tax increase for Everson next year
- Cezanne likely to attract bidders
- Fleury’s career-best 6th shutout lifts Penguins over Avalanche in overtime
- Normalville church performs Christmas play
- Trained teachers, staff to treat allergic students under Pennsylvania law
- Steelers must be creative in providing snaps for linebackers
- LaBar: Comparing NXT to WWE
- Time is of essence for Pitt in finding football coach, athletic director
- Youngwood fire department, recalling community’s help in dark hour, reaches out to homeless family