Share This Page

Things aren't as bad as federal government's pessimism would have you believe

| Thursday, Oct. 10, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

A lot of good things are happening. They just take extra looking at, that's all.

The oh-so-awful government “shutdown,” for example. Well, it happened — and what do you know? Turns out people get along fine without so much government for a while. And if for a while, why not longer?

From such episodes, dreaded in the Beltway but secretly desired in the nonpolitical world, we learn what government services we really need. The armed forces and air traffic controllers? Absolutely. And notice, they've never lost an hour. But thousands of bureaucrats at the Environmental Protection Agency, the Internal Revenue Service and scads of others? No problem, guys, take a few days off.

No doubt there have been instances of hardship, mostly inflicted by spite. The public has to feel it, see, if Congress dares tighten the money valve.

That's how officialdom cleverly managed to put up barriers against 80- and 90-year-old veterans and their families from the World War II Memorial, a site wide open to passers-by on any given day.

Also idiotically calculated to inflict hurt was a stop to clinical trials of potentially lifesaving drugs; this even though dedicated public servants would surely get to the job even in a “shutdown,” confident they'll be paid eventually.

The next crisis is another phantom filled with scarecrow straw: the debt ceiling.

Golly, what if Oct. 17 comes around and lawmakers are still in “gridlock”? The Treasury couldn't borrow more than the $16.7 trillion already on our tab? Would we “default,” besmirching the faith and credit of the United States of America?

Of course not.

Treasury could simply pay on the bonds due and hold back other spending. This might inconvenience some special interests, but so what?

A Washington crisis of this cry-wolf sort is more revealing than in the past. We're getting wise to it. Millions of folks begin realizing just how high the cost of government has grown for very little obvious good.

Inevitably, it calls into question other inflation sore spots. College tuitions, for example, and the accompanying burden of student loans — for diplomas that do not, in millions of cases, lead to good jobs.

Likewise, soaring medical costs. Whether Obamacare brings down total costs or not, it should surely refocus the public on something that might. Tax-free Health Savings Accounts, for one, combined with high-deductible catastrophic insurance. Strangely, these get very little promotion. Americans will begin to save on health costs when they give up the illusion that somebody else is paying. Health insurance properly understood means financial protection against getting ruined. Cancer, heart attack or accident could do that to you. So insure against losses of $5,000 or more — not colds, shots and routine office visits.

On the employment front is a welcome new revving up of the Great American Job Machine.

It's happening in oil and gas; the return of manufacturing from offshore; and 3.9 million jobs going unfilled even in a recovery scarred by too much unemployment. How about our schools preparing more kids to go for those jobs? What are we waiting for?

Government is perhaps cause to be pessimistic, but the times are filled with promise.

Jack Markowitz is a Thursday columnist of Trib Total Media. Email him at jmarkowitz@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.