ShareThis Page

Brit's take on U.S. capitalism misses the mark

| Thursday, April 10, 2014, 12:01 a.m.

British-born author Simon Winchester is an America booster with an angle.

A freshly naturalized U.S. citizen, he can't get over how a country this big got pulled into one nation.

He credits our bumper crop of never-stay-down inventors and entrepreneurs.

It's an oft-told tale but always worth reminders.

Winchester tackles it in an enthusiastic new book, “The Men Who United the States” ($29.99, Harper­Collins, 463 pages). Unfortunately, you have to give it a demerit for political correctness.

American unity starts with the Constitution, many would say. Winchester starts it with an adventure: the irresistible Lewis and Clark expendition of 1803. President Thomas Jefferson sent the daring duo out to explore his vast Louisiana Purchase (just $15 million, still amazing!) across the plains and over the Rockies to the Pacific, if they could find it.

In time came canal-building, steamboats, the telegraph, railroads, telephone, Edison's light bulb and the alternating current of Tesla and Westinghouse, cars, radio, interstate highways, television and Internet. Lots of heroes along the way. And not all made fortunes.

Winchester singles out unsung engineer Theodore Judah for demonstrating that a transcontinental railroad could cross all the barriers. But he scants the organizers and moneymen who actually built the thing with immigrant labor.

Also uncelebrated here are the oil, steel, coal and glass industries, the sewing machines and farm equipment that industrialized and fed the people. And brought millions to these shores.

It was an achievement to create an unum out of America's pluribus, but gritty industry and grubby finance deserve to take bows too.

Winchester cites as a flaw in free enterprise the failure by early utilities to extend electric lines out into the countryside long after cities were ablaze with light. The “pitiless arithmetic of capitalism,” he says, left millions of farm families dark.

But the only pitiless thing about it is that investor-owned companies don't freely opt to lose money. Nobody would build windmills today without taxpayer subsidies.

So of course We the People eventually had to power up the boondocks. The Rural Electrification Administration of the 1930s New Deal was a “governmental body that lit up those parts of America that capitalism forgot,” as Winchester sourly puts it.

One of his heroes turns out to be midwestern radio broadcaster William Siemering, the “principal founding architect of what would become National Public Radio, NPR.” It seems to mystify the author that Americans don't view radio “not merely as a machine for printing money but as a nation-unifying force for the public good.” That's how Canada, Australia and Britain see it, he says.

Yeah, but also Russia, Iran and Venezuela. No thanks for such unity. America's strength is otherwise, if only it can be kept.

Jack Markowitz is a Thursday columnist of Trib Total Media. Email

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.