TribLIVE

| Business


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Feds seize all secrets on laptop

Daily Photo Galleries

Friday, Jan. 31, 2014, 12:01 a.m.
 

It's pretty obvious that we as a society are now made up of two groups. There are those who have moved their lives into the digital realm, and those who haven't.

I would like to introduce you to someone in the latter category. His name is Edward Korman, and he is a federal judge in New York state. He had a case involving a U.S. citizen, a Ph.D. student at McGill University in Montreal, who had his computer confiscated while returning to the States. The judge ruled, sweepingly, that yes, the federal government had a right to confiscate laptops at the border without probable cause.

In other words: You are traveling overseas with your laptop, tablet or smartphone. As you re-enter the United States, a federal official, for any reason or none, can take it away from you and look through it, and there's nothing you can do about it.

Here's what I have on my laptop. Years of email. Private conversations from close friends about personal matters, some of them tragic, heart-wrenching and life-changing, and similar messages from my husband. There are thousands of family photos, medical information about me and my family, business plans that affect my family's current and future livelihood.

Something else is there as well. What's on my laptop is a reflection of my mind — my most elated moments and deepest thoughts. It's me.

Either you live in a world in which this extension of your very consciousness — and your constant access to it — is an inextricable part of your life, or you don't. You either appreciate that a laptop is a costly and delicate instrument you'd just as soon not be cavalierly tossed around by a TSA employee, or you do not. And you recoil at the thought of strangers pawing through that information on a whim, with trivial legal oversight, or you do not.

It was odd — there's surprisingly little talk about the ruling online. (It came down on New Year's Eve afternoon.) The more you read, the weirder the rules are. The so-called “border exemption” extends 100 miles inland from the border. That includes the population of the Eastern Seaboard, Miami, Houston, the West Coast and Chicago.

I wanted to find a smart legal mind who'd considered the issue. I finally found someone who had. He came up with a simple encapsulation to prevent this sort of intrusion into our private lives for no reason. It went like this:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized

That's the Fourth Amendment, of course. The writer was James Madison, with help from a few friends.

Judge Korman, I am quite sure, isn't the sort to carry his life around in his laptop. The ironic thing about his ruling is that while initially I thought it encapsulated a division between people who live in the past (the judge) and the future (me and, I assume, you), but it's obvious this issue was well-debated by some smart people a very long time ago.

Email Kim Komando at techcomments@usatoday.com.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Stories

  1. Pirates’ Worley tosses 4-hit shutout vs. Giants
  2. Westmoreland women stole thousands to finance dog show appearances
  3. Steelers hoping that youth movement breathes life into team
  4. Steelers notebook: Team hasn’t called on Keisel, Harrison yet
  5. Inside the ropes: Shazier shows off speed
  6. Pirates expect high prices in trade market
  7. Pittsburgh Brewing tries to reconnect with region, return to glory days
  8. Police say naked woman stabs three women during street fight in McKees Rocks
  9. Steelers linebacker Spence confident he can avoid injury setbacks
  10. Pennsylvania Turnpike Southern Beltway extension gets funding
  11. Latrobe man who admitted role in fatal crash allowed to continue driving
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.