ShareThis Page

RE2 Robotics of Pittsburgh wins Navy contract for autonomous loading, unloading system

Aaron Aupperlee
| Wednesday, Oct. 18, 2017, 5:09 p.m.
An RE2 Robotics robot designed to handled explosive devices.
Photo from RE2 Robotics
An RE2 Robotics robot designed to handled explosive devices.
An RE2 Robotics robot looks for an explosive device in a backpack.
Photo from RE2 Robotics
An RE2 Robotics robot looks for an explosive device in a backpack.

RE2 Robotics will receive $125,000 from the U.S. Navy to design an autonomous cargo loading and unloading system, the company announced Wednesday.

Even when the military is able to deliver cargo using an unmanned drone, it must be unloaded by hand.

“Manual handling of cargo increases time the aircraft is on the ground in the landing zone and increases exposure of personnel to dangerous situations. Autonomous load and unload capability would greatly reduce burden on Marine Corps troops who typically move cargo out of the supplying aircraft,” Jorgen Pedersen, president and CEO of RE2 Robotics, said in a statement .

RE2 Robotics, based in Lawrenceville, has received several military-related contracts. In June, the Air Force selected the company to develop a drop-in robot pilot to convert manned aircraft into unmanned aircraft.

The Navy in February selected RE2 Robotics to develop manipulator arms to handle explosives underwater. In January, RE2 Robotics was selected by the Army to develop technology to assist combat medics .

Aaron Aupperlee is Tribune-Review staff writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.