Share This Page

Spencer Tracy bio delves deeply into actor's life

According to James Curtis, author of the new 1,056-page "Spencer Tracy: A Biography," it could have been actress Loretta Young who became the love of Tracy's life, not Katharine Hepburn, his partner for 26 years and with whom he made nine films.

Tracy and Young, both Catholics, began their romance while working together on the 1933 Depression-era drama "A Man's Castle." Although Tracy was married to Louise Treadwell, the illicit pair would go to Mass and confessions together.

"I think they were drawn together because of the shared bond of faith," said Curtis, who spent six years on the book, drawing from Tracy's own papers and obtaining the cooperation of the actor's daughter, Susie Tracy.

But it was also their faith that caused the relationship to end after about a year. Tracy wouldn't divorce Treadwell, and Young wouldn't have married a divorced man.

Hepburn didn't have such hang-ups. Tracy met her on the set of George Stevens' 1942 classic romantic comedy "Woman of the Year."

"Hepburn really kind of inserted herself into Tracy's life," said Curtis. "She fell madly in love with him, though she was never sure that he felt the same way about her. They had some rough times, but she was absolutely devoted to him. I think she's a very interesting person who was, in some ways, completed by Tracy. He was not reluctant to tell her to shut up."

The Milwaukee-born Tracy is considered an actor's actor, who won two Academy Awards, one for playing a vibrant Portuguese fisherman in 1937's "Captains Courageous," the other for portraying the noble Father Flanagan in 1938's "Boys Town." He moved effortlessly between comedies such as 1950's "Father of the Bride" and dramas such as 1961's "Judgment at Nuremberg." He even did a horror movie: 1941's "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde."

But Tracy was beset with demons, including a drinking problem and guilt over his marital affairs and that his son, John Tracy, was born deaf.

Susie Tracy is thrilled that Curtis' book offers new insights into her mother, who stayed married to Tracy for more than 40 years and founded the John Tracy Clinic for the deaf. "He didn't meet Miss Hepburn until 1942," she said. "There were many years before that where a lot went on that people should know about."

Her mother, who had been an accomplished actress and polo player, "could do almost anything," said Tracy. "She was also a writer. She wrote some lovely poetry."

Tracy said that her dad was very much like the charming, devoted father of Elizabeth Taylor in "Father of the Bride" and 1951's "Father's Little Dividend."

"He had a sense of humor," Tracy remarked. "He was funny. He always had a joke at the dinner table. He told a joke wonderfully."

It was director-producer Stanley Kramer who gave Tracy a splashy final act, casting him in 1960's "Inherit the Wind," "Judgment at Nuremberg," 1963's "It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World" (after which he had a massive heart attack) and 1967's "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner" (the frail 67-year-old Tracy died just two weeks after its completion).

Katharine Houghton, Hepburn's niece, who costars in "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner," recalls that her aunt was a "basket case" during the production of "Dinner" because of Tracy's failing health.

"I think they both wanted to do the movie," said Houghton, who had known Tracy since she was little. "They thought it was an important film, and they loved Stanley Kramer. I think they felt that, 'OK. It's better than just sitting around waiting to die. Let's try it.' I think it did prolong Spencer's life by several months because he had to meet the challenge."

Additional Information:

Get the book

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.