Crafton OKs zoning request
The last remaining greenspace in Crafton along the Chartiers Creek is one step closer to being developed.
At a public hearing Monday night, Crafton Council voted 4-2 to rezone the 14-acre patch of land in the Chartiers Creek valley area from light industrial to residential. Council members Dan Cindric and Heidi Munn dissented and council President Mike Crown abstained.
The designation still must be approved by Thornburg and Rosslyn Farms. It would allow developer Greicon Construction to build 40 single-family homes on the land.
The councils of Crafton, Rosslyn Farms and Thornburg held a joint public hearing last night to consider the rezoning request. Rosslyn Farms and Thornburg council members had to leave the meeting and did not vote on the request. Thornburg is to vote Jan. 5.
The property starts between Ewing Road, Chartiers Creek, Lincoln Street and the Crafton-Ingram-Thornburg baseball fields.
The joint planning commission last month recommended that the land be rezoned to a single family residential district, rather than a multifamily district.
In a contract between Greicon and former land owners Jack and Phyllis Duncan, the developer is limited to building single-family homes.
Cindric said in an ideal world, there wouldn't be any kind of development in the valley area.
"The land is needed for green space. It's often used for storm water retention. It's needed for recreation space," Cindric said.
"We need more in a community than just houses," he added.
All recommendations made by the joint planning commission have been approved by the joint councils, Cindric said.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.