Monroeville Finance Authority OKs $420M in bonds for UPMC projects
UPMC will pay for construction projects and refinance debt with up to $420 million in tax-exempt bonds the health care system will receive through the new Monroeville Finance Authority.
The five members of the finance authority unanimously approved the authority's first bond issuance at a meeting on Thursday night.
“We are very happy it got approved. We plan to proceed to take advantage of the interest rates as early as next week,” UPMC Treasurer Tal Heppenstall said of the bond market.
UPMC expects to borrow $400 million, which will be split between paying for new construction projects and refinancing debt on existing projects in Monroeville and Pittsburgh.
UPMC's $240 million hospital, UPMC East, opened in Monroeville in July.
About $45 million of the bond issuance will be used to reimburse UPMC for money it spent on UPMC East, Heppenstall said.
Monroeville officials say the municipality will create an additional revenue stream by issuing the bonds.
“This is, I believe, an excellent way of enhancing revenue with no impact on Monroeville taxpayers,” said authority Chairman Rich Lopiccolo.
If UPMC borrows $400 million, the bond issuance will generate $35,000 in upfront fees plus $100,000 for Monroeville annually for 30 years, including the first year of the agreement, Heppenstall said.
Some people disagree.
Four opponents, including two UPMC employees who complained that the nonprofit is getting tax breaks while not paying fair wages to its workers, spoke against the bond issuance during a public hearing before the vote.
Monroeville created the finance authority in April to issue tax-exempt bonds on the behalf of nonprofit organizations. That came at the behest of UPMC.
Tory Parrish is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-380-5662 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.