Pennsylvania universities to issue students IDs they can use during election
The 14 universities in the Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education will add expiration dates to student photo ID cards so they can be used to vote in the general election.
A state law takes effect this fall that requires voters to present photo identification at the polls. A stipulation in the law, which is being challenged in the courts, requires that cards must have an expiration date to be an eligible form of identification.
The schools, which enroll nearly 120,000 students and include Indiana, California and Slippery Rock universities, agreed voluntarily to add expiration dates, said Amanda Witmer, a spokeswoman for the Pennsylvania Department of State.
In Pittsburgh, the private Duquesne University said it will provide an expiration date on ID cards for students who don't have other forms of voter identification.
The University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University, state-related schools, issue photo ID cards that include an expiration date.
Robert Beecher, a spokesman for the Pennsylvania College Democrats, said the two schools are in a minority. He said most colleges in the state will have to modify their ID cards if students want to use them to vote, the most common change being the addition of an expiration date.
Debra Erdley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7996 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.