TribLIVE

| Home


Weather Forecast
 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Taxpayers unwitting donors to athletes' charities

About The Tribune-Review
The Tribune-Review can be reached via e-mail or at 412-321-6460.
Contact Us | Video | Photo Reprints
Related Stories

Daily Photo Galleries


By Carl Prine and Rob Rossi

Published: Saturday, Oct. 13, 2012, 8:59 p.m.

WASHINGTON — Several foundations run by athletes during the past decade received tens of millions of tax dollars through government grants or earmarks from members of Congress.

A Tribune-Review analysis found:

• $28.4 million in federal, state and local government aid for the Cal Ripken Sr. Foundation's anti-crime programs and a ballpark in Maryland;

• Nearly $7.8 million went to two educational nonprofits of billionaire golfer Tiger Woods;

• About $6 million each went to former tennis star Andre Agassi's Las Vegas educational nonprofit and the cancer charity started by bicyclist Lance Armstrong;

• More than $500,000 went to the Mario Lemieux Foundation for hospital playrooms and a cancer awareness campaign.

The Ripken charity, founded in 2001 by former Baltimore Orioles infielders Cal Ripken Jr. and his brother, Billy, to honor their deceased dad, a former Major League Baseball manager, derived 45 percent of its revenue over nine years from taxpayers.

Most of the money that the Cal Ripken Sr. Foundation received went to federal juvenile crime prevention programs — often without proof that the spending made a difference.

“We're going to do, every single day of the week, whatever it takes to help save these kids' lives,” said Steve Salem, president of the Ripken foundation and a former Washington-based lobbyist. “Nobody benefited from that federal money, for example, except the kids.”

Some lawmakers have a different view. Sen. John McCain, an Arizona Republican and former presidential candidate, spoke out on the House floor in 2007 against $1.5 million earmarked for the Ripkens' organization.

McCain warned fellow lawmakers that even when they mean well, “pork spending” on favored constituents “mortgages our children's future for our own political gain.”

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Stories

  1. Five years later, Crosby wants another Cup win
  2. Starkey: Fleury’s future at stake
  3. Burrell school board reviews security plan
  4. Bronze flower vases stolen from cemetery
  5. Watch out for the freeze
  6. Jailed Hribal ‘fine,’ but family ‘terrible’ as answers in stabbing sought
  7. Leechburg adds 2 part-time police officers
  8. Cheswick fire truck to arrive in June
  9. Brush fire season keeps firefighters busy
  10. South Fayette parents express dissatisfaction with handling of bullying
  11. Legal experts question prosecuting South Fayette boy for recording bullies
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.