Egypt's Islamists, liberals clash; Morsy seems headed for fight with judiciary
CAIRO – Thousands of Egyptian liberals and Islamists clashed for hours here on Friday, the worst unrest since the Muslim Brotherhood won control of parliament in January and the presidency in June.
The violence erupted as President Mohamed Morsy seemed to be headed for a fight with the country's judiciary.
The events underscore how polarized the world's most populous Arab nation has grown since the February 2011 ouster of dictator Hosni Mubarak.
More than 100 were injured in street fighting that spilled out of Tahrir Square, the center of last year's revolution.
Liberals had called three weeks ago for a “Day of Accountability” to protest Morsy's record so far.
The Brotherhood set the stage for confrontation by ordering a competing demonstration over recent not-guilty verdicts in the infamous “Camel Battle” case — the trial of 24 horse- and camel-riding thugs who killed 12 Tahrir Square protesters in 2011.
Islamists destroyed a podium used by liberal speakers as liberals chanted against the Brotherhood. Clashes continued into the night, with two buses set ablaze near the Egyptian Museum.
Adel Hassouna, 47, an Egypt Air flight attendant, stood watching. He said he came “to press the president to fulfill his promises on the constitution and justice.”
“We want the constitution to represent all the people,” Hassouna said, adding that the Brotherhood-dominated panel writing the document is “not representative.”
Said fellow flight attendant Mahmoud Hameida, 35: “Egypt is not only an Islamic country – it should be for everyone. The Muslim Brotherhood is not Egypt.”
The Islamists' presence confused Hameida. “They are the ruling party. Why are they here?” he asked. Then, shaking his head as stones and firebombs flew, he added: “No one will win today.”
Islamist officials denied their followers were in the crowd. Yet many protesters wore Brotherhood ball caps, some accompanied by children in T-shirts with Morsy's image.
Bearded men shouting “God is great!” stoned backers of Hamdeen Sabahi, a liberal presidential candidate who narrowly lost to Morsy in May's first-round vote. Sabahi's followers carried posters with a face that was half Mubarak's, half Morsy's, or that pictured Morsy shaking hands with Mohammed Tantawi, former head of the hated military council.
Adding to the unrest is a growing row between Morsy and the judiciary after he removed the state's general prosecutor, Abdel Meguid Mahmoud, and appointed him as Egypt's ambassador to the Vatican.
A growing popular chorus has demanded Mahmoud's sacking over the “Camel Battle” acquittals.
Mahmoud is defying Morsy, challenging his authority. Egyptian media has quoted him as saying he was threatened by a senior judge allied with the president.
Essam El Erian, a deputy of the Brotherhood's Freedom and Justice political party, warned him in a Twitter post: “I advise you to accept the new position with dignity. Think thoroughly, your other options are difficult.”
Egyptian judges — some of whom decried Morsy's action as infringing on the judiciary — will meet on Sunday to discuss the dispute.
Betsy Hiel is the Tribune-Review'sforeign correspondent. Email her at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pitt’s challenge: Contani Miami’s Johnson, Dorsett
- OPEC decision on crude sets small producers on perilous path, analysts say
- NFL notebook: Browns’ Manziel says he tried to avoid altercation
- Fewer Dems to fight for ObamaCare
- Steelers notebook: Defense has a retro feel
- Inside the National Cathedral ‘prayer service’
- U.S.-backed rebels push forward in southern Syria
- Penguins notebook: Malkin clicking on power play
- The AG-designate: Tough questions for Loretta Lynch
- Mirai debut brings fuel cell future closer
- Salvation Army in W.Pa. uses social media campaign