Ligonier man could serve 20 years for sex assault
A repeat sex offender will serve up to 20 years in prison for molesting a young girl in 2010.
David Lee Stouffer, 26, of Ligonier Borough was sentenced Friday to serve 10 to 20 years behind bars and 14 years on probation.
Westmoreland County Judge Debra Pezze said the sentence could have been harsher but that she accepted the recommendation of prosecutors, who proposed a revised penalty based on the wishes of the victim's family.
“The victim's mother wrote a letter and said she does not believe jail is appropriate,” said Assistant District Attorney Judy Petrush. “She did not want the matter to proceed to trial.”
Stouffer in February pleaded guilty to attempted aggravated assault, indecent assault and child endangerment.
In return for Stouffer dropping a request to withdraw a guilty plea and agreeing to a finding that he was a sexually violent predator, Petrush proposed cutting the prison sentence by two years and making the probationary period longer.
Stouffer will not be punished for violating his probation on another sex case he was convicted of in 2005. In that case, Stouffer was convicted of molesting a child and served seven years on probation.
In the most recent case, police said Stouffer had inappropriate sexual contact with a 9-year-old girl between Aug. 1 and Nov. 30, 2010.
Rich Cholodofsky is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6293 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.