Court: State board must hear North Side charter school's appeal
A state board that helps oversee the opening and closing of charter schools must review a North Side charter school's application to add grade levels, an appellate court ordered Friday.
Northside Urban Pathways Charter School, which serves about 300 poor and minority students in grades 6 through 12, in December 2009 requested that Pittsburgh Public Schools allow it to add kindergarten and grades 1 through 5. In February 2010, the school board denied the request.
Northside appealed to the State Charter School Appeal Board, which later said it lacked jurisdiction to rule on the matter.
Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt wrote in the majority opinion that although the law does not address whether the appeal board can rule on such changes, denying a charter school such a forum would be “very limiting.” President Judge Dan Pellegrini and Judge Robert Simpson dissented.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.