Storm doesn't deter Bid for Hope attendees
Lest anyone need reminded just how far the long arm of Steelers Nation can stretch, Monday proved that neither an impending hurricane nor a couple of hundred miles could keep diehards from scoring a little one-on-one time with their favorites.
“We came from Michigan … we braved Frankenstorm!” confessed Bill Mansfield with his wife, Erin, as they found themselves at the end of a long autograph line that snaked its way around Jergel's Rhythm Grille.
“It's definitely worth it ... but I wish I had gotten in line sooner!” Erin added.
That sentiment was shared among a sold-out crowd that came with footballs in hand for the likes of Brett Keisel, Troy Polamalu, Chris Rainey, Charlie Batch and Leonard Pope to make their mark on. Now in its 11th year, Bid for Hope drew the likes of Walter Scheide, Tom Crowley, Chad Dewey, Jill andWalt Cavalier,Michael Cavalier, Ken Richards and his son, Austin — many of whom were repeat attendees.
“It's so important that we set the protocol for this,” shared founder Diana Napper as she spoke about the battle that women younger than 40 face with their insurance companies when it comes to early detection of breast cancer. “Come hell or high water, we're gonna change that.”
Hosted by the Steelers' Heath Miller and his wife, Katie, the event benefited A Glimmer of Hope Foundation, which focuses on breast cancer awareness. To date, Glimmer has raised more than $1.8 million to further fund the largest premenopausal breast cancer study in the nation.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.