Oakland in 2025: Smoother traffic flow, bicycle trails and gardens
Imagine driving through Oakland without traffic backups on Fifth and Forbes avenues.
Planners want that and a neighborhood with community gardens, artwork and bicycle trails connected to other parts of Pittsburgh.
Those things are included for consideration under The Oakland 2025 Master Plan. Whether they will happen depends largely on community members and Oakland's ability to attract investors, said Wanda Wilson, executive director of the Oakland Planning and Development Corp.
“I think through the partnerships that we have we're pretty confident that we can begin to implement some of the components of this plan,” she said. “There are going to be some things that are going to take us a while to get there.”
The plan, which can be found on the OPDC website at www.opdc.org, offers a vision for the next 15 years, Wilson said. OPDC will outline the plan publicly from 6-8 p.m. Thursday at the University of Pittsburgh's Alumni Hall.
“Once you have the vision, which this sets out, then we can really begin to look at how do we make this happen,” said City Councilman Daniel Lavelle, whose district includes part of Oakland. “From a governmental standpoint it helps us direct resources, usually financial, to projects over the years.”
Bob Bauder is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-765-2312 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.