Obama’s ‘bankruptcy’ bilge
By Marc A. Thiessen
Published: Saturday, November 3, 2012, 9:03 p.m.
Updated: Tuesday, November 13, 2012
In an interview with Rolling Stone, President Barack Obama called Mitt Romney an expletive. But here in Ohio, it is Obama who is peddling the B.S. when it comes to Romney and automobile-company bankruptcy. The question is: Will Obama's bankruptcy line win him the Buckeye State — and with it, a second term in the White House?
The president clearly is betting on it. An Obama campaign ad running here declares that Romney wanted the auto industry to “fail,” and an auto worker says, “Mitt Romney would have just let us go under, just let them go bankrupt.”
Three years ago, Obama was singing a different tune when it came to bankruptcy. “I know that when people even hear the word ‘bankruptcy,' it can be a bit unsettling, so let me explain what I mean,” Obama told worried auto workers in 2009. Bankruptcy, the president said, is simply a “tool that we can use” to “make it easier for General Motors and Chrysler to quickly clear away old debts that are weighing them down so they can get back on their feet and onto a path to success.” It is not, Obama insisted, “a process where a company is simply broken up, sold off and no longer exists.”
Now Obama is using the “B” word to suggest that is exactly what Romney wanted to do.
So how does Obama attack Romney for wanting bankruptcy for GM and Chrysler? Romney, Obama claims, would not have provided “government assistance to the U.S. auto companies, even if they went through bankruptcy,” adding that “we would have lost a million jobs.”
This is false. Romney wanted the federal government to guarantee private-sector loans, while Obama wanted the federal government to provide the loans directly. No matter, Obama continues to peddle the falsehood that Romney would have let GM and Chrysler die.
While the facts are on Romney's side, the messaging is not. The Romney campaign allowed Obama to dominate the airwaves for months and to hammer Romney with bankruptcy attacks without responding — allowing the impression to harden that Romney opposed federal help for the auto industry.
Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, has been a lonely voice in countering the Obama bankruptcy assault. He wrote an op-ed, published in Cleveland's Plain Dealer newspaper, in which he declared, “The question was never whether to let Detroit go under, but how best to save it.” And at a rally in Defiance, Ohio, while Romney didn't mention the bankruptcy issue, Portman took the argument head-on: “Mitt Romney did propose government help. ... And folks, all the independent fact-checkers who have looked at this agree: President Obama ... is ... not telling the truth.”
The Romney campaign is beginning to highlight the fact that Obama's plan was, in Portman's words, a “political bankruptcy” that put the government in charge of “picking winners and losers.” GM plants in Mansfield, Columbus and Parma were shut down and more than 100 local dealerships in Ohio were among the losers in Obama's plan.
A Cincinnati Enquirer/Ohio Newspapers poll shows the race now tied at 49 percent apiece — which means Ohio, and ultimately the presidency, could hinge on who wins the fight over the auto bailout. Will the late-breaking Romney counterassault be enough to turn the tide or is it too little too late? We'll know the answer soon.
Marc A. Thiessen, a fellow with the American Enterprise Institute, writes a weekly online column for The Washington Post.
- Robinson: Steelers rookie Wheaton could be impact receiver
- Penguins GM Shero: ‘Whole idea’ was improvement during playoffs
- Ribbon, wristband solemn reminders for Penguins coach Bylsma
- Key acquisitions have Penguins primed for run to Stanley Cup
- Veteran Clark envisions finishing career as a member of Steelers
- Penguins to face Bruins in Eastern Conference final
- Starkey: Pirates’ Huntington never looked so good
- Marijuana supporters rally at the Point
- SeaWorld’s Antarctica latest challenge to Disney
- Letang dazzles with dynamic play in Game 5 win
- Pirates notebook: Cutter a boon for Melancon
You must be signed in to add comments
To comment, click the Sign in or sign up at the very top of this page.
Lies lets see, they didn't have private industry willing to fund the bankruptcy hence the reason they needed government support. Republicans are now telling Ohio that Jeep is moving to China, except that isn't true all to win an election. Anyone connected to Karl Rove and Norquist should be considered unamerican. If Rove and Norquist want to run the county let them run for office, instead of pulling strings from behind closed doors.